When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Supreme Court decision guide: Takeaways from the Trump ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-decision-guide...

    What it means: The Supreme Court ruling has established boundaries regarding free speech online and ruled that the government can call on tech companies to remove misinformation and falsehoods on ...

  3. Trump v. United States (2024) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_v._United_States_(2024)

    In response, Smith filed his own brief on February 14, 2024, urging the Supreme Court to deny Trump's request and citing the urgency of the pending 2024 presidential election. Smith also requested that if the Supreme Court took the case, to treat Trump's request as a petition for writ of certiorari, and put the case on an expedited schedule. [39]

  4. Supreme Court Tells Texas to Hold On

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-tells-texas-hold...

    Plus: More reactions to the Supreme Court's other decision in the Trump ballot disqualification case, D.C.'s continued minimum wage confusion, California's primary elections, and more...

  5. DeVillier v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devillier_v._Texas

    Texas, 601 U.S. 285 (2024), was a case that the Supreme Court of the United States decided on April 16, 2024. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] The case dealt with the Supreme Court's takings clause jurisprudence . Because the case touched on whether or not the 5th Amendment is self-executing, the case had implications for Trump v.

  6. Supreme Court decisions on Trump immunity, social media and ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-decisions-trump...

    The Supreme Court is nearing the end of its term, but a number of cases heard by the high court still need to be resolved. Supreme Court decisions on Trump immunity, social media and Jan. 6 still ...

  7. Medellín v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medellín_v._Texas

    Medellín v. Texas, 552 U.S. 491 (2008), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court that held even when a treaty constitutes an international commitment, it is not binding domestic law unless it has been implemented by an act of the U.S. Congress or contains language expressing that it is "self-executing" upon ratification. [1]

  8. A Texas newspaper has lambasted former president Donald Trump’s decision to hold his first 2024 presidential campaign rally not far from the site of the deadly law enforcement siege in Waco ...

  9. Texas v. Johnson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_v._Johnson

    Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 5–4, that burning the Flag of the United States was protected speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as doing so counts as symbolic speech and political speech.