When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: batson challenge in civil case law

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Batson v. Kentucky - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batson_v._Kentucky

    Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court ruling that a prosecutor's use of a peremptory challenge in a criminal case—the dismissal of jurors without stating a valid cause for doing so—may not be used to exclude jurors based solely on their race.

  3. Category:Batson challenge case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Batson_challenge...

    Pages in category "Batson challenge case law" The following 17 pages are in this category, out of 17 total. This list may not reflect recent changes. ...

  4. Powers v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powers_v._Ohio

    Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case that re-examined the Batson Challenge. [1] Established by Batson v.Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), the Batson Challenge [2] prohibits jury selectors from using peremptory challenges on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, and sex.

  5. J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J.E.B._v._Alabama_ex_rel._T.B.

    J.E.B. extended the court's existing precedent in Batson v. Kentucky (1986), which found race-based peremptory challenges in criminal trials unconstitutional, [2] and Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Company (1991), which extended that principle to civil trials. [3] As in Batson, the court found that sex-based challenges violate the Equal ...

  6. Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmonson_v._Leesville...

    Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Company, 500 U.S. 614 (1991), was a United States Supreme Court case which held that peremptory challenges may not be used to exclude jurors on the basis of race in civil trials. [1] Edmonson extended the court's similar decision in Batson v. Kentucky (1986), a criminal case.

  7. In the landmark case of Batson v. Kentucky (1986), the Supreme Court reversed a criminal conviction because of the prosecutor's racially motivated use of peremptory challenges. [171] There are three steps to a Batson inquiry. First, the party opposing the use of a peremptory challenge must make a prima facie case.

  8. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    A defendant facing the death penalty may challenge for cause a prospective juror who would automatically vote to impose the death penalty in every case Georgia v. McCollum: 505 U.S. 42 (1992) standard on peremptory challenges from Batson v. Kentucky applied to criminal defendant Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Association: 505 U.S. 88 ...

  9. Category:United States civil procedure case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:United_States...

    Batson challenge case law (17 P) C. United States class action case law ... United States civil due process case law (3 C, 41 P) United States discovery case law (1 C ...