When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: concurred vs approved case for apple watch ultra 1 price

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Apple Watch - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Watch

    The second generation Apple Watch has two models; the Apple Watch Series 1 and Apple Watch Series 2. The Series 1 has a variant of the dual-core Apple S2 processor with GPS removed, known as the Apple S1P. It has a lower starting price than first generation. [73] The Series 1 was sold only in Aluminium casings.

  3. Apple Watch Ultra - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Watch_Ultra

    Apple Watch Ultra is a line of sport smartwatches produced by Apple Inc. as part of the Apple Watch product line. Introduced in September 2022, they are marketed towards endurance athletes and outdoor recreation, and carry a rugged form factor with a wider band, a larger, brighter display, multi-band GPS, a larger battery, water temperature sensor, and additional functionality for diving.

  4. Apple has an approved fix to get around the Watch ban ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/apple-approved-fix-around-watch...

    On December 18, Apple opted to preemptively begin taking the Series 9 and Ultra 2 versions of the Apple Watch out of stock in anticipation of the ruling kicking in. Sales resumed, however, shortly ...

  5. United States v. Apple (2012) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Apple_(2012)

    In June 2014, Apple settled the e-book antitrust case out of court with the States; however still appealed Judge Cote's initial ruling. [5] In June 2015, the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals, by a 2–1 vote, concurred with Judge Cote that Apple conspired to e-book price fixing and violated federal antitrust law. [6] [7] Apple appealed the decision.

  6. Litigation involving Apple Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litigation_involving_Apple...

    The case In re Apple iPod iTunes Antitrust Litigation was filed as a class action in 2005 [9] claiming Apple violated the U.S. antitrust statutes in operating a music-downloading monopoly that it created by changing its software design to the proprietary FairPlay encoding in 2004, resulting in other vendors' music files being incompatible with and thus inoperable on the iPod. [10]

  7. List of United States Supreme Court trademark case law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    8–1 Procedural: Recovery Majority: Warren: Lanham Act: The Lanham Act specifies available compensatory remedies, and they do not include attorney's fees; furthermore, attorney's fees are generally not recoverable without statutory or contractual provisions. United States v. Sealy, Inc. 388 U.S. 350: 1967: 6–1 Non-trademark: Anti-trust ...