When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: united states ring size chart

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ring size - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_size

    In the United States, Canada, and Mexico, ring sizes are specified using a numerical scale with 1 ⁄ 4 steps, where whole sizes differ by 0.032 inches (0.81 mm) of internal diameter, equivalent to 0.1005 inches (2.55 mm) of internal circumference.

  3. Body jewelry sizes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_jewelry_sizes

    Some jewelry may use the significantly different Standard Wire Gauge (SWG) scale instead, particularly jewelry from Canada or the United Kingdom where the SWG scale is used. [2] Both AWG and SWG express sizes as a gauge, but the numbers are different. For example, AWG 12g is 2.1 mm, but SWG 12g is 2.6 mm. AWG 8g happens to be the same as SWG 10g.

  4. Category:Rings (jewellery) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Rings_(jewellery)

    Articles relating to rings, round bands, usually of metal, worn as ornamental jewellery.The term "ring" by itself always denotes jewellery worn on the finger; when worn as an ornament elsewhere, the body part is specified within the term, e.g., earrings, neck rings, arm rings, and toe rings.

  5. Skip a Trip to the Jeweler—Here's Exactly How To ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/skip-trip-jeweler-heres-exactly...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. U.S. standard clothing size - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._standard_clothing_size

    In 1958, the National Bureau of Standards invented a new sizing system, based on the hourglass figure and using only the bust size to create an arbitrary standard of sizes ranging from 8 to 38, with an indication for height (short, regular, and tall) and lower-body girth (plus or minus). The resulting commercial standard was not widely popular ...

  7. Talk:Ring size - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ring_size

    I've seen other pages that list it as ring_diameter = 11.54 + 0.83 * ring size, which more closely agrees with the size 0 number. On the other hand, a linear regression of this chart results in 11.634 + .8136 x ring_size. It's all over the place, and the charts don't even match from store to store.