Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio, commonly known as CAPE, [1] Shiller P/E, or P/E 10 ratio, [2] is a stock valuation measure usually applied to the US S&P 500 equity market. It is defined as price divided by the average of ten years of earnings (moving average), adjusted for inflation. [3]
As the chart below shows, the adjusted P/E ratio has recently climbed well above its historical mean, as well at its average level since 1990. ... Simply put, the Shiller P/E ratio has been ...
The Shiller P/E ratio is at 38.5. The Shiller price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio is an effective way to measure how expensive valuations are in the stock market because it compares the S&P 500 to ...
S&P 500 Shiller CAPE Ratio Chart. S&P 500 Shiller CAPE Ratio data by YCharts. To elaborate, approximately 815 months have passed since the S&P 500 was created in 1957. In that period, the index ...
The S&P 500's Shiller price-to-earnings (P/E) Ratio, also known as the cyclically adjusted P/E Ratio , ended Dec. 27 at 37.94, which is a stone's throw from its 2024 high and the third-highest ...
Robert Shiller's plot of the S&P composite real price–earnings ratio and interest rates (1871–2012), from Irrational Exuberance, 2d ed. [1] In the preface to this edition, Shiller warns that "the stock market has not come down to historical levels: the price–earnings ratio as I define it in this book is still, at this writing [2005], in the mid-20s, far higher than the historical average
The S&P's Shiller P/E ratio has only hit 38 times in two other periods: during the dot-com bubble, and early in 2022, before the market pulled back. The ratio was sitting at 38.8 times at the ...
Robert Shiller's plot of the S&P 500 price–earnings ratio (P/E) versus long-term Treasury yields (1871–2012), from Irrational Exuberance. [1]The P/E ratio is the inverse of the E/P ratio, and from 1921 to 1928 and 1987 to 2000, supports the Fed model (i.e. P/E ratio moves inversely to the treasury yield), however, for all other periods, the relationship of the Fed model fails; [2] [3] even ...