When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: right to travel vs police department insurance companies

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Freedom of movement under United States law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_movement_under...

    In Paul v. Virginia, 75 U.S. 168 (1869), the court defined freedom of movement as "right of free ingress into other States, and egress from them." [1] However, the Supreme Court did not invest the federal government with the authority to protect freedom of movement. Under the "privileges and immunities" clause, this authority was given to the ...

  3. Kent v. Dulles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_v._Dulles

    Kent v. Dulles, 357 U.S. 116 (1958), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the right to travel and passport restrictions as they relate to First Amendment free speech rights. [1] It was the first case in which the U.S. Supreme Court made a distinction between the constitutionally protected substantive due process freedom of ...

  4. Freedom of movement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_movement

    Freedom of movement. Freedom of movement, mobility rights, or the right to travel is a human rights concept encompassing the right of individuals to travel from place to place within the territory of a country, [1] and to leave the country and return to it. The right includes not only visiting places, but changing the place where the individual ...

  5. Shapiro v. Thompson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shapiro_v._Thompson

    Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that invalidated state durational residency requirements for public assistance and helped establish a fundamental "right to travel" in U.S. law. Shapiro was a part of a set of three welfare cases all heard during the 1968–69 term by the Supreme Court, alongside Harrell v.

  6. Glik v. Cunniffe - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glik_v._Cunniffe

    Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 (1st Cir. 2011) is a case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that a private citizen has the right to record video and audio of police carrying out their duties in a public place, and that the arrest of the citizen for a wiretapping violation violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights.

  7. Brightline bridge vs. human needs? Parks savior victimized ...

    www.aol.com/brightline-bridge-vs-human-needs...

    The latest effort to "Improve" Florida's state parks was done without the knowledge or input of the public it represents, the employees whose job it is to care for the parks or the ...