Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Groupthink can have a strong hold on political decisions and military operations, which may result in enormous wastage of human and material resources. Highly qualified and experienced politicians and military commanders sometimes make very poor decisions when in a suboptimal group setting.
The concept of herd mentality has been studied and analyzed from different perspectives, including biology, psychology and sociology. This psychological phenomenon can have profound impacts on human behavior. Social psychologists study the related topics of collective intelligence, crowd wisdom, groupthink, and deindividuation.
While cohesiveness, loyalty and consensus are worthy attributes, groupthink can result when dissenting opinions are discouraged. Diffusion of responsibility – Sociopsychological phenomenon whereby each person in a group is less likely to take responsibility when others are present.
In groupthink theory, a mindguard is a member of a group who serves as an informational filter, providing limited information to the group and, consciously or subconsciously, utilizing a variety of strategies to control dissent and to direct the decision-making process toward a specific, limited range of possibilities. [1]
It leads to a kind of groupthink in our political thought and expression. And it creates chokepoints in our conversations that can be exploited to tamp down on dissent.
Groupshift can be seen to be evident within groupthink as a sub-set of typical thinking patterns that occur in group situations and can be observed in society in situations such as student bodies, government, sporting teams and juries.
Groupthink, in which the desire for harmony or conformity in a group results in irrational or dysfunctional decision-making Sheeple, a derogatory term referring to groups of people who ‘mindlessly’ follow those in power; Swarm intelligence, the collective behavior of decentralized, self-organized systems, natural or artificial
The success of groupthink also hinges on the long-term homogeneity of the group, which seeks to keep that same cohesiveness and therefore to avoid all potential conflict. [13] However, while groupthink, to some extent, depends on the ability of individuals to perceive attitudes and desires of others, the Abilene paradox hinges on the in ability ...