Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In the case of potential harms, the policy offered by the affirmative functions as a preventive measure or "sure deterrence". As is so often the case in academic debate, the bigger the harms, the bigger the impacts. For example, many teams enjoy running the nuclear outfall Harms plank, drawing mushroom clouds on their debate round flowsheets.
Off-case arguments made include topicality, disadvantages, counter plans, and critiques. The negative generally also goes on case, contesting the advantage scenarios presented by the affirmative in the 1AC, also often contesting solvency and/or inherency.
Policy debate is an American form of debate competition in which teams of two usually advocate ... Counterplans narrow down the on-case arguments to: advantages the ...
Topicality: The Affirmative case must affirm the resolution, since that is the job of the Affirmative in a debate round. The Affirmative case often is shown to be within the bounds of the resolution as defined by appropriate definitions, or functional implementation or resolution instrumentality through the Affirmative plan. When the resolution ...
Debate background: Immigration a key issue even as encounters at southern border drop Immigration has been one of the top issues for voters during the presidential campaign season.
At the start of the debate, Harris tried to portray Trump’s proposal of across-the-board tariffs on foreign goods as a “sales tax.” Tariffs are distinct from sales taxes, which are fees ...
In a 2019 then-Rep. Tulsi Gabbard gained attention for her stinging criticism of Kamala Harris' record. Now, she's helping Trump prep for Tuesday's debate.
The case is a form of on-topic debate and can also be referred to as C if done in the standard way C is a very effective way to win a case. The case is generally organized into sections called "observations" or "contentions", with advantages attached to the link or link break.