Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Although considered an authoritarian or illiberal form of state socialism, often referred to and conflated as socialism by critics and argued as a form of state capitalism by left-wing critics, those states [which?] were ideologically Marxist–Leninist and declared themselves to be workers' and peasants' or people's democracies.
Left-wing politics typically involve a concern for those in society whom its adherents perceive as disadvantaged relative to others as well as a belief that there are unjustified inequalities that need to be reduced or abolished [1] through radical means that change the nature of the society they are implemented in. [5] According to emeritus ...
While the existence of left-wing authoritarianism as a psychological construct has been criticised, a study found evidence for both left-wing and right-wing authoritarianism. [ 93 ] Authoritarianism and democracy
The interpretation of tough-mindedness as a manifestation of "authoritarian" versus tender-minded "democratic" values was incompatible with the Frankfurt School's single-axis model, which conceptualized authoritarianism as being a fundamental manifestation of conservatism and many researchers took issue with the idea of "left-wing ...
The existence of the Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China raised the question of whether there is such a thing as "left-wing authoritarians", since these countries were highly authoritarian yet also left-wing. [38] This article concerns itself with the concept of authoritarianism as a psychological construct rather than a political ...
But they are facing off with an ideological foe that prioritizes left-wing authoritarian government far above individuals' liberties. Remember, during Supreme Court oral arguments in Murthy v.
Column: In 2024, it's an election between authoritarianism and the uncommitted. Anita Chabria. March 6, 2024 at 6:00 AM. Trump supporters and vaccine opponents protest in front of L.A. City Hall ...
A survey of Canadian legislative caucuses conducted between 1983 and 1994 by Bob Altemeyer showed an 82% correlation between party affiliation and score on a scale for right-wing authoritarianism when comparing right-wing and social democratic caucuses. There was a wide gap between the scores of the two groups, which was filled by liberal caucuses.