When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Gonzales v. Oregon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzales_v._Oregon

    Gonzales v. Oregon, 546 U.S. 243 (2006), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court which ruled that the United States Attorney General cannot enforce the federal Controlled Substances Act against physicians who prescribed drugs, in compliance with Oregon state law, to terminally ill patients seeking to end their lives, commonly referred to as assisted suicide. [1]

  3. Oregon's top court hears arguments in suit filed by GOP ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/oregons-top-court-hears...

    The Oregon Supreme Court heard oral arguments Thursday in a lawsuit filed by Republican state senators who boycotted the Legislature for a record six weeks earlier this year and want to run for ...

  4. 1994 Oregon Ballot Measure 16 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_Oregon_Ballot_Measure_16

    In October 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzales v. Oregon to determine the fate of the Death with Dignity law. Arguing on behalf of the state was Oregon Senior Assistant Attorney General Robert Atkinson. Oregon's five Democratic members of Congress also filed a brief in support of the State's position. [16]

  5. Oregon v. Mitchell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_v._Mitchell

    Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 U.S. 112 (1970), was a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the states of Oregon, Texas, Arizona, and Idaho challenged the constitutionality of Sections 201, 202, and 302 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) Amendments of 1970 passed by the 91st United States Congress, and where John Mitchell was the respondent in his role as United States Attorney General. [1]

  6. Brandeis brief - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandeis_brief

    The Brandeis brief consisted of more than 100 pages, only two of which were devoted to legal argument. [3] The rest of the document contained testimony by medics, social scientists, and male workers arguing that long hours had a negative effect on the "health, safety, morals, and general welfare of women."

  7. De Jonge v. Oregon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Jonge_v._Oregon

    De Jonge v. Oregon, 299 U.S. 353 (1937), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Fourteenth Amendment's due process clause applies the First Amendment right of freedom of assembly to the individual U.S. states. [1]

  8. Apodaca v. Oregon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apodaca_v._Oregon

    Oregon, 406 U.S. 404 (1972), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that state juries may convict a defendant by a less-than-unanimous verdict in a felony criminal case. [1] The four-justice plurality opinion of the court, written by Justice White , affirmed the judgment of the Oregon Court of Appeals and held that there ...

  9. Oregon Court of Appeals - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Court_of_Appeals

    The Oregon Legislature has debated adding additional judgeships in both 2011 and 2012. [4] Three seats were added in 2013 to bring the total to thirteen. [ 5 ] The Oregon Court of Appeals is one of the busiest appellate courts in the country, handling between 3,200 and 4,100 cases annually during a recent ten-year period.