Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In February 2024, the New York Daily News carried an opinion piece by Nick Akerman, former assistant U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York and assistant special Watergate prosecutor, who commented on the similarities with the Watergate case, and stated that Trump was facing almost certain conviction. [71]
New York v. Trump is a civil investigation and lawsuit by the office of the New York Attorney General (AG) alleging that individuals and business entities within the Trump Organization engaged in financial fraud by presenting vastly disparate property values to potential lenders and tax officials, in violation of New York Executive Law § 63(12).
You know, at a certain point, there's a breaking point." Trump has vowed to appeal his conviction by the New York jury, which found him guilty of 34 felony counts over falsifying documents to ...
People v. Trump Court New York Supreme Court Full case name The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump Submitted March 30, 2023 Started April 15, 2024 Decided May 30, 2024 Verdict Guilty on all counts Charge First-degree falsifying business records (34 counts) Citation IND-71543-23 Case history Subsequent action Sentence of unconditional discharge Court membership Judge sitting ...
At a courtroom in New York, on Sept. 20, Judge Raymond Dearie holds his first public hearing since being appointed special master to review documents the FBI seized from Donald Trump's Florida home.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Donald Trump suffered a pair of legal setbacks on Thursday as judges spurned his calls to dismiss criminal charges over the former U.S. president's efforts to overturn his ...
The New York Times reported that the resignations followed a monthlong pause of evidence being presented to the jury, which was expected to remain seated until the end of April, [61] [62] as well as discussions about charging Trump with conspiracy and falsifying financial records (instead of a fraud charge). [58]
After denying requests by the defense to treat Trump's tuition payments for Weisselberg's grandchildren as gifts [91] and to have a corporate liability law declared "constitutionally vague", [94] Merchan instructed jurors regarding the application of New York's corporate liability law to their verdict. [67] [95] The jury began deliberations on ...