Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Most commonly, courts martial are convened to try members of the Canadian military for criminal violations of the Code of Service Discipline, which is the Canadian military's criminal code. [ 2 ] [ 1 ] The constitutionality of military courts martial was upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada in R v Généreux , but changes were mandated to ...
The CMAC was established in 1959 by Parliament under the National Defence Act, to replace the Court Martial Appeal Board. Due to the court's small caseload, justices of the CMAC are cross-appointed from justices of provincial superior courts and the Federal Court and Federal Court of Appeal. [1] Appeals from the CMAC lie with the Supreme Court ...
Canadian Council of Churches v Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) [1992] 1 SCR 236 January 23, 1992 Standing R v Genereux [1992] 1 SCR 259 February 13, 1992 constitutionality of being tried by court martial. R v Butler [1992] 1 SCR 452 February 27, 1992 pornography and freedom of expression R v Wise [1992] 1 SCR 527
Canada’s Emergencies Act is being used because of a public order emergency, to deal with blockades of downtown Ottawa and border crossings in several Canadian cities by people protesting COVID ...
The Supreme Court of Canada is the court of last resort and final appeal in Canada. Cases successfully appealed to the Court are generally of national importance. Once a case is decided, the Court publishes written reasons for the decision, that consist of one or more opinions from any number of the nine justices.
On 21 December 2006, a Federal Court judge rejected a request to proceed with a court martial against an unnamed JTF 2 officer, accused of assaulting and mistreating a subordinate. Because court martial requests require that the accused be named, the judge suggested that they explore other avenues to proceed with the court martial. [36]
Reference Re Supreme Court Act, ss 5 and 6 [2014] 1 S.C.R. 433, 2014 SCC 21 March 21, 2014 Supreme Court Quebec slots, Supreme Court Act amendment process, Supreme Court appointments Peracomo Inc v TELUS Communications Co [2014] 1 S.C.R. 621, 2014 SCC 29 April 23, 2014 Maritime law, marine insurance Reference re Senate Reform
Canada's highest court is set to hear arguments on Tuesday on when a young person can be considered an adult for sentencing purposes. The result may reshape how Canada sentences youth and could, a ...