When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_Pennsylvania...

    The EEOC argued that it possesses a broad Congressional mandate to investigate and remedy employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, and that any infringement of the University's First Amendment rights is permissible because of the substantial relation between the EEOC's request and the overriding ...

  3. Metallica v. Napster, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallica_v._Napster,_Inc.

    Metallica traced the leak to a file on Napster's peer-to-peer file-sharing network, where the band's entire catalogue was available for free download. [5] Metallica argued that Napster was enabling users to exchange copyrighted MP3 files. [6] Metallica sought a minimum of $10 million in damages, at a rate of $100,000 per illegally downloaded ...

  4. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A&M_Records,_Inc._v...

    Napster's ease of use compared to other peer-to-peer services quickly made it a popular service for music enthusiasts to find and download digital song files for free. [1] The legacy record industry immediately took action against what it believed to be unauthorized copying of its copyrighted musical works within the Napster service.

  5. List of copyright case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_copyright_case_law

    The first-sale doctrine applies to software. UMG v. MP3.com: 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5761: S.D.N.Y. 2000 Distribution of copyrighted music without permission of the copyright holders is infringement even if the downloader already owns a copy of the music. A & M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. 239 F.3d 1004: 9th Cir. 2001

  6. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Employment...

    Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, 575 U.S. 768 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding a Muslim American woman, Samantha Elauf, who was refused a job at Abercrombie & Fitch in 2008 because she wore a headscarf, which conflicted with the company's dress code. [1]

  7. Arista Records LLC v. Lime Group LLC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arista_Records_LLC_v._Lime...

    As the litigation continued, the parties consented to a permanent injunction on 26 October 2010 shutting down the LimeWire file-sharing service. [16] The permanent injunction prohibits LimeWire from copying, reproducing, downloading, or distributing a sound recording, as well as directly or indirectly enabling or assisting any user to use the LimeWire system to copy, reproduce or distribute ...

  8. Federal Express Corp. v. Holowecki - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Express_Corp._v...

    The Court accepted the EEOC’s test for determining whether a filing constituted a charge as set forth in its amicus curiae brief as well as internal directives, and decided: “In addition to the information required by the regulations, i.e., an allegation and the name of the charged party, if a filing is to be deemed a charge it must be ...

  9. Music piracy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_piracy

    Napster became hugely popular because it made it so easy to share and download music files. However, the heavy metal band Metallica sued the company for copyright infringement. [11] This led to other artists following suit and shutting down Napster's service. Likewise, Limewire was a free peer-to-peer file sharing software similar to that of ...