Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Judicial restraint is a judicial interpretation that recommends favoring the status quo in judicial activities and is the opposite of judicial activism.Aspects of judicial restraint include the principle of stare decisis (that new decisions should be consistent with previous decisions); a conservative approach to standing and a reluctance to grant certiorari; [1] and a tendency to deliver ...
The avoidance doctrine flows from the canon of judicial restraint and is intertwined with the debate over the proper scope of federal judicial review and the allocation of power among the three branches of the federal government and the states. It is also premised on the "delicacy" and the "finality" of judicial review of legislation for ...
Judicial activism is a judicial philosophy holding that courts can and should go beyond the applicable law to consider broader societal implications of their decisions. It is sometimes used as an antonym of judicial restraint. [1] The term usually implies that judges make rulings based on their own views rather than on precedent. [2]
Following list consists countries with separate constitutional courts. Yet some other countries do not have separate constitutional courts, but instead delegate constitutional judicial authority to their ordinary court system, with the final decision-making power resting in the supreme ordinary court. Nonetheless, such courts are sometimes also ...
Judicial restraint was violated; Elfes lost his specific case but the court cemented personal liberty in general. Justice Heck defined the limits of the court relative to the specialised court system. 1958 1 BvR 400/51 [28] Lüth Decision (Lüth-Urteil) The court of Hamburg prohibited Erich Lüth to call for a boycott of the film Immortal Beloved.
Judicial restraint, a theory of judicial interpretation that encourages judges to limit the exercise of their own power; Prior restraint, a government's actions that prevent materials from being distributed; Restraint on alienation, in property law, a clause that seeks to prohibit the recipient of property from transferring his or her interest
A further development in English thought was the idea that the judicial powers should be separated from the executive branch. This followed the use of the juridical system by the Crown to prosecute opposition leaders following the Restoration, in the late years of Charles II and during the short reign of James II (namely, during the 1680s). [11]
In the context of Roe v Wade, the Wikipedia article would suggest that the Supreme Court upholding Roe would be judicial restraint, whereas most other reputable sources (e.g. Britannica) would imply that overturning Roe would be judicial restraint, since it would be the Court deferring to Congress on abortion policy, such as the Women's Health ...