When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Evolutionary debunking - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionary_debunking

    An evolutionary debunking, sometimes referred to as an evolutionary debunking argument or evolutionary debunking thesis, is a philosophical argument which holds that, because humans (like all organisms) have an evolutionary origin, the principles of ethics and morality that we have devised are invalid and cannot be considered objective knowledge.

  3. Deflationary theory of truth - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deflationary_theory_of_truth

    Tarski's material adequacy condition, or Convention T, is: a definition of truth for an object language implies all instances of the sentential form (T) S is true if and only if P. where S is replaced by a name of a sentence (in the object language) and P is replaced by a translation of that sentence in the metalanguage.

  4. Christological argument - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christological_argument

    Another argument is that the resurrection of Jesus occurred and was an act of God, hence God must exist. Some versions of this argument have been presented, such as N. T. Wright's argument from the nature of the claim of resurrection to its occurrence and the "minimal facts argument", defended by scholars such as Gary Habermas and Mike Licona, which defend that God raising Jesus from the dead ...

  5. Eliminative materialism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eliminative_materialism

    Eliminative materialism (also called eliminativism) is a materialist position in the philosophy of mind. It is the idea that the majority of mental states in folk psychology do not exist. Some supporters of eliminativism argue that no coherent neural basis will be found for many everyday psychological concepts such as belief or desire, since they are poorly defined. The argument is that ...

  6. Argument from ignorance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

    There is a debate over whether the argument from ignorance is always fallacious. It is generally accepted that there are only special circumstances in which this argument may not be fallacious. For example, with the presumption of innocence in legal cases, it would make sense to argue: [5] It has not been proven that the defendant is guilty.

  7. Fact-check: Trump unleashed a torrent of misinformation on ...

    www.aol.com/news/fact-checking-biden-trump...

    Fact check: Trump says Biden didn’t run for president due to 2017 Charlottesville rally “He made up the Charlottesville story, and you’ll see it’s debunked all over the place.

  8. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    Judgmental language – using insulting or pejorative language in an argument. Pooh-pooh – stating that an opponent's argument is unworthy of consideration. [84] Style over substance – embellishing an argument with compelling language, exploiting a bias towards the esthetic qualities of an argument, e.g. the rhyme-as-reason effect [85]

  9. 6 lotto myths debunked - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/6-lotto-myths-debunked-odds...

    The winning numbers for the historic $2.04 billion Powerball jackpot were released on Tuesday. Those numbers are 10, 33, 41, 47 and 56, and the Powerball is 10. A single winning ticket in ...