When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Argument from ignorance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

    There is a debate over whether the argument from ignorance is always fallacious. It is generally accepted that there are only special circumstances in which this argument may not be fallacious. For example, with the presumption of innocence in legal cases, it would make sense to argue: [5] It has not been proven that the defendant is guilty.

  3. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    Judgmental language – using insulting or pejorative language in an argument. Pooh-pooh – stating that an opponent's argument is unworthy of consideration. [84] Style over substance – embellishing an argument with compelling language, exploiting a bias towards the esthetic qualities of an argument, e.g. the rhyme-as-reason effect [85]

  4. No true Scotsman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

    The description of the fallacy in this form is attributed to British philosopher Antony Flew, who wrote, in his 1966 book God & Philosophy, . In this ungracious move a brash generalization, such as No Scotsmen put sugar on their porridge, when faced with falsifying facts, is transformed while you wait into an impotent tautology: if ostensible Scotsmen put sugar on their porridge, then this is ...

  5. Informal fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informal_fallacy

    The premises of an argument may be seen as the foundation on which the conclusion is built. According to this analogy, two things can go wrong and turn an argument into a fallacy. It could be that the foundation is shaky. But even a solid foundation is not helpful if it does not provide support for the conclusion in question. [5]

  6. Begging the question - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question

    Historically, begging the question refers to a fault in a dialectical argument in which the speaker assumes some premise that has not been demonstrated to be true. In modern usage, it has come to refer to an argument in which the premises assume the conclusion without supporting it. This makes it an example of circular reasoning. [1] [2]

  7. Supreme Court rejects appeals from Trump-allied ‘Kraken ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-rejects-appeals...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  8. Validity (logic) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Validity_(logic)

    A standard view is that whether an argument is valid is a matter of the argument's logical form. Many techniques are employed by logicians to represent an argument's logical form. A simple example, applied to two of the above illustrations, is the following: Let the letters 'P', 'Q', and 'S' stand, respectively, for the set of men, the set of ...

  9. 6 lotto myths debunked - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/6-lotto-myths-debunked-odds...

    The winning numbers for the historic $2.04 billion Powerball jackpot were released on Tuesday. Those numbers are 10, 33, 41, 47 and 56, and the Powerball is 10. A single winning ticket in ...