Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In theoretical computer science, the time complexity is the computational complexity that describes the amount of computer time it takes to run an algorithm. Time complexity is commonly estimated by counting the number of elementary operations performed by the algorithm, supposing that each elementary operation takes a fixed amount of time to ...
O(log n) Space complexity In computer science , a min-max heap is a complete binary tree data structure which combines the usefulness of both a min-heap and a max-heap , that is, it provides constant time retrieval and logarithmic time removal of both the minimum and maximum elements in it. [ 2 ]
Created independently in 1977 by W. Eddy and in 1978 by A. Bykat. Just like the quicksort algorithm, it has the expected time complexity of O(n log n), but may degenerate to O(n 2) in the worst case. Divide and conquer, a.k.a. merge hull — O(n log n) Another O(n log n) algorithm, published in 1977 by Preparata and Hong. This algorithm is also ...
Its worst case time complexity for 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional space is (), but when the input precision is restricted to () bits, its worst case time complexity is conjectured to be (), where is the number of input points and is the number of processed points (up to ).
It requires Θ(n log n) time, where n is the number of items to be packed. The algorithm can be made much more effective by first sorting the list of items into decreasing order (sometimes known as the first-fit decreasing algorithm), although this still does not guarantee an optimal solution and for longer lists may increase the running time ...
The above algorithm has worst-case time and space complexities of O(mn) (see big O notation), where m is the number of elements in sequence A and n is the number of elements in sequence B. The Hunt–Szymanski algorithm modifies this algorithm to have a worst-case time complexity of O ( mn log m ) and space complexity of O ( mn ) , though it ...
The auxiliary indices have turned the search problem from a binary search requiring roughly log 2 N disk reads to one requiring only log b N disk reads where b is the blocking factor (the number of entries per block: b = 100 entries per block in our example; log 100 1,000,000 = 3 reads).
Removing a point from a balanced k-d tree takes O(log n) time. Querying an axis-parallel range in a balanced k-d tree takes O(n 1−1/k +m) time, where m is the number of the reported points, and k the dimension of the k-d tree. Finding 1 nearest neighbour in a balanced k-d tree with randomly distributed points takes O(log n) time on average.