Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
1.0 m 3 (35 cu ft) cubic centimetre: cm3 cm 3: US spelling: cubic centimeter one millilitre 1.0 cm 3 (0.061 cu in) cc cc cubic millimetre: mm3 mm 3: US spelling: cubic millimeter: 1.0 mm 3 (6.1 × 10 −5 cu in) non-SI metric: kilolitre: kl kl US spelling: kiloliter one cubic metre 1.0 kl (35 cu ft) kL kL litre: l L US spelling: liter one cubic ...
Conversions between units in the metric system are defined by their prefixes (for example, 1 kilogram = 1000 grams, 1 milligram = 0.001 grams) and are thus not listed in this article. Exceptions are made if the unit is commonly known by another name (for example, 1 micron = 10 −6 metre).
Metric units are units based on the metre, gram or second and decimal (power of ten) multiples or sub-multiples of these. According to Schadow and McDonald, [1] metric units, in general, are those units "defined 'in the spirit' of the metric system, that emerged in late 18th century France and was rapidly adopted by scientists and engineers.
1 km 2 means one square kilometre, or the area of a square of 1000 m by 1000 m. In other words, an area of 1 000 000 square metres and not 1000 square metres. 2 Mm 3 means two cubic megametres, or the volume of two cubes of 1 000 000 m by 1 000 000 m by 1 000 000 m, i.e. 2 × 10 18 m 3, and not 2 000 000 cubic metres (2 × 10 6 m 3).
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
1793: The grave (the precursor of the kilogram) was defined as the mass of 1 litre (dm 3) of water, which was determined to be 18841 grains. [11] 1795: the gram (1 / 1000 of a kilogram) was provisionally defined as the mass of one cubic centimetre of water at the melting point of ice. [12] 1799: The Kilogramme des Archives was manufactured as a ...
From January 2008 to December 2012, if you bought shares in companies when Frederick W. Smith joined the board, and sold them when he left, you would have a 3.6 percent return on your investment, compared to a -2.8 percent return from the S&P 500.
From September 2011 to December 2012, if you bought shares in companies when William J. DeLaney joined the board, and sold them when he left, you would have a 16.3 percent return on your investment, compared to a 18.4 percent return from the S&P 500.