When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Right and wrong - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_and_wrong

    Right and wrong may refer to: Ethics , or moral philosophy, a branch of philosophy that involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong behavior Morality , the differentiation of intentions, decisions and actions between those that are distinguished as proper and those that are improper

  3. False equivalence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence

    If A is the set containing c and d, and B is the set containing d and e, then since they both contain d, A and B are equal. In an even more fallacious version, d is not required to exist in both sets; merely a similarity of two items d 1 in set A and d 2 in set B is cited to assert equivalence among the sets. [3] Example:

  4. Two wrongs don't make a right - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_wrongs_don't_make_a_right

    The phrase "two wrongs infer one right" appears in a poem dated to 1734, published in The London Magazine. [2] This is an informal fallacy that occurs when assuming that, if one wrong is committed, then another wrong will cancel it out.

  5. List of fallacies - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

    Tu quoque ('you too' – appeal to hypocrisy, whataboutism) – stating that a position is false, wrong, or should be disregarded because its proponent fails to act consistently in accordance with it. [112] Two wrongs make a right – assuming that, if one wrong is committed, another wrong will rectify it. [113]

  6. Wikipedia:Two wrongs don't make a right - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Two_wrongs_don't...

    If Editor 1 claims that Editor 2 did something wrong, ask whether the information at hand indicates that Editor 2 did, in fact, do something wrong. If the answer is no, then look at Editor 1's role. If it looks like neither of them really did anything wrong, then the complaint should probably be closed with no action. But if it looks like ...

  7. Betteridge's law of headlines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge's_law_of_headlines

    Betteridge's law of headlines is an adage that states: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no."It is named after Ian Betteridge, a British technology journalist who wrote about it in 2009, although the principle is much older.

  8. Distinction without a difference - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distinction_without_a...

    A distinction without a difference is a type of logical fallacy where an author or speaker attempts to describe a distinction between two things where no discernible difference exists. [1] It is particularly used when a word or phrase has connotations associated with it that one party to an argument prefers to avoid.

  9. List of English words with disputed usage - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_English_words_with...

    A aggravate – Some have argued that this word should not be used in the sense of "to annoy" or "to oppress", but only to mean "to make worse". According to AHDI, the use of "aggravate" as "annoy" occurs in English as far back as the 17th century. In Latin, from which the word was borrowed, both meanings were used. Sixty-eight percent of AHD4's usage panel approves of its use in "It's the ...