When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. 2016 Indian banknote demonetisation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Indian_banknote...

    Similar PILs were also filed in the Supreme Court of India. [187] In November 2017, the Supreme Court of India referred all cases which have similarity to demonetisation to constitutional bench to review the legality of the demonetisation, implementation irregularities and violation of people's rights by limits on cash withdrawals. [188]

  3. Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loper_Bright_Enterprises_v...

    On June 28, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, overturning Chevron USA v. National Resources Defense Council and the federal judiciary's forty-year-old practice of deferring to agencies' reasonable interpretations of ambiguous federal laws.

  4. List of landmark court decisions in India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    List of landmark court decisions in India. Landmark court decisions in India substantially change the interpretation of existing law. Such a landmark decision may settle the law in more than one way. In present-day common law legal systems it may do so by: [1][2] Establishing a significant new legal principle or concept; Overturning prior ...

  5. Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Entertainment...

    Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, 564 U.S. 786 (2011), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that struck down a 2005 California law banning the sale of certain violent video games to children without parental supervision.

  6. McGirt v. Oklahoma - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McGirt_v._Oklahoma

    McGirt v. Oklahoma, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a landmark [1] [2] United States Supreme Court case which held that the domain reserved for the Muscogee Nation by Congress in the 19th century has never been disestablished and constitutes Indian country for the purposes of the Major Crimes Act, meaning that the State of Oklahoma has no right to prosecute American Indians for crimes allegedly ...

  7. Disproportionate assets case against J. Jayalalithaa - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disproportionate_assets...

    Misuse of office, Disproportionate assets, Criminal conspiracy, Corruption. Verdict. Supreme Court: Trial court verdict restored. High Court: Acquitted of all charges, bail bonds discharged. Trial Court: 4 years' simple imprisonment for all four, a fine of ₹ 100 crore for Jayalalithaa and ₹ 10 crores for the other three. Convictions.

  8. Legal experts warn that latest Supreme Court leaks are ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/legal-experts-warn-latest...

    Brianna Herlihy. September 16, 2024 at 6:29 PM. Following revelations of private memoranda and conversations between Supreme Court justices published in the New York Times, legal experts are ...

  9. Supriyo v. Union of India - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supriyo_v._Union_of_India

    Supriyo a.k.a Supriya Chakraborty & Abhay Dang v. Union of India thr. Its Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice & other connected cases (2023) are a collection of landmark cases of the Supreme Court of India, which were filed to consider whether to extend right to marry and establish a family to sexual and gender minority individuals in India ...