When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: when should something be italicized

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Titles of works - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/...

    Titles in quotation marks that include (or in unusual cases consist of) something that requires italicization for some other reason than being a title, e.g. a genus and species name, or a non-English phrase, or the name of a larger work being referred to, also use the needed italicization, inside the quotation marks: "Ferromagnetic Material in ...

  3. Wikipedia : Manual of Style/Text formatting

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/...

    Italics should only be used if the quoted material would otherwise call for italics. Use italics within quotations to reproduce emphasis that exists in the source material or to indicate the use of non-English words. The emphasis is better done with {}.

  4. Wikipedia:Manual of Style - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_style

    Use of italics should conform to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Text formatting § Italic type. Do not use articles ( a , an , or the ) as the first word ( Economy of the Second Empire , not The economy of the Second Empire ), unless it is an inseparable part of a name ( The Hague ) or of the title of a work ( A Clockwork Orange , The Simpsons ).

  5. Wikipedia talk : Manual of Style/Titles of works/Archive 2

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of...

    I see previously in 2010 it was agreed series should be either italicized or left as is (based on whether the series name is official or something like that). Yet, this edit in 2011 changes series to quotation marks (with exception for italicization), with the edit summary pointing to another section in which the answer was to quote series.

  6. Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Text formatting - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of...

    With regard to words that shouldn't be italicized (CMS lists the examples of croissant, banh mi, pasha, Weltanschauung, [2] kaiser, obscure, recherché, bourgeoisie, telenovela, anime, eros, agape, and mise en scène), they all follow this criterion well. However, some words that should be italicized also fit this criterion.

  7. Help talk:Citation Style 1/Archive 63 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help_talk:Citation_Style_1/...

    That's something to italicize, because it's still a publication. "It depends" -> No, it basically doesn't. If you are citing it for the fact it has published something of interested, then it is de facto a publication and should accordingly be italicized (much as SMC says below). --Izno 18:27, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

  8. Wikipedia talk : Manual of Style/Text formatting/Archive 4

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of...

    One source suggests websites should be italicized when being referenced: Hudson, Robert (2010). The Christian Writer's Manual of Style, p.279. ISBN 9780310861362. in a manner compatible with the Modern Language Association and the Chicago Manual of Style. Hyacinth 08:59, 19 March 2012 (UTC) They should be italicized as works like any other work.

  9. Wikipedia : Manual of Style/Captions

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/...

    The text of captions should not be specially formatted (with italics, for example), except in ways that would apply if it occurred in the main text. Several discussions (e.g. this one) have failed to reach a consensus on whether "stage directions" such as (right) or (behind podium) should be in italics, set off with commas, etc. Any one article ...