When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. EASE Guidelines for Authors and Translators of Scientific ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EASE_Guidelines_for...

    EASE Guidelines summarize the most important editorial recommendations, aiming to make international scientific communication more efficient and to aid in preventing scientific misconduct. They also support the global initiative Healthcare Information For All by 2015 by advising authors to make abstracts of their papers highly informative ...

  3. Web of Science - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_of_Science

    The Web of Science (WoS; previously known as Web of Knowledge) is a paid-access platform that provides (typically via the internet) access to multiple databases that provide reference and citation data from academic journals, conference proceedings, and other documents in various academic disciplines.

  4. Wikipedia : Scientific citation guidelines

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Scientific...

    The goal is to achieve a reasonable balance between ease of verification, readability and editability. This page also describes some sensible guidelines for dealing with issues that are specific to writing Wikipedia articles (compared to writing for the academic press). Footnotes (<ref> tags) are used in examples throughout this page.

  5. Science-wide author databases of standardized citation ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science-wide_author...

    The papers introducing the ranking have been quoted extensively by authors working in Bibliometrics and Scientometrics.For example, reference [3] describing an update to the methodology of this index number receives about 200 citations in Google Scholar [12] from authors publishing in journals such as SAGE's Research on Social Work Practice, [10] Elsevier's Perspectives in Ecology and ...

  6. Wikipedia : Identifying reliable sources (science)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...

  7. Wikipedia:Notability (academics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability...

    Books on pseudo-science and marginal or fringe scientific theories are generally not covered by this criterion; their authors may still be notable under other criteria of this guideline or under the general WP:BIO or WP:N guidelines. Patents, commercial and financial applications are generally not indicative of satisfying Criterion 7. 8.

  8. ResearcherID - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ResearcherID

    By searching either the name of the author or ResearcherID on the Web of Science ResearcherID website, users can find the author's present occupation, his or her publications, key words of research fields, main topics of published literature and direct links to information page of the most cited publications, though full text cannot be uploaded ...

  9. Highly Cited Researchers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Highly_Cited_Researchers

    As of their 2022 list, Clarivate uses "performance statistics" from data in the Web of Science.There are 21 specific fields, and one for interdisciplinary science—Clarivate creates a list of papers that are in the top 1% most highly cited in their field, [a] and admission to the HCR list is based on an author's number of papers in the top 1%.