When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: are citations in abstracts bad words definition list

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Help:Citations quick reference - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Citations_quick_reference

    Footnotes with list-defined references; Shortened footnotes; Citations can also be placed as external links, but these are not preferred because they are prone to link rot and usually lack the full information necessary to find the original source in cases

  3. Wikipedia:Citation overkill - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_overkill

    An article with just four or five really good sources is considered better referenced than an article that cites 500 bad ones. Overloading an article with bad citations can backfire if the article is nominated for deletion. Participators may not want to look at all one hundred citations, and they may instead choose to look at just a smaller sample.

  4. Wikipedia:Citing sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources

    This is usually displayed as a superscript footnote number: [1] The second necessary part of the citation or reference is the list of full references, which provides complete, formatted detail about the source, so that anyone reading the article can find it and verify it. This page explains how to place and format both parts of the citation.

  5. Wikipedia:Citing sources/Further considerations - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources/...

    This page includes some additional considerations for citing sources. The information is here so as not to distract from content on the main Citing sources project page, which is designed to help newer editors get started quickly.

  6. Citation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation

    xkcd webcomic titled "Wikipedian Protester". The sign says: "[CITATION NEEDED]".[1]A citation is a reference to a source. More precisely, a citation is an abbreviated alphanumeric expression embedded in the body of an intellectual work that denotes an entry in the bibliographic references section of the work for the purpose of acknowledging the relevance of the works of others to the topic of ...

  7. Wikipedia:Citation underkill - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citation_underkill

    The word some is an unsupported weasel word because the source does not accurately reflect the opinion of reliabel sources support that word in reference to that content. See WP:SOME . The following is correct: The evidence indicates that following this diet may lead to improvements in terms of body composition and metabolic effects compared ...

  8. Help:Referencing for beginners - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Referencing_for_beginners

    {} for references to general websites {} for newspapers and news websites {} for references to books {{cite journal}} for magazines, academic journals, and papers; A template window then pops up, where you fill in as much information as possible about the source, and give a unique name for it in the "Ref name" field.

  9. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Words_to_watch

    Some words, by their structure, can suggest extended forms that may turn out to be contentious (e.g. lesbian and transgender imply the longer words lesbianism and transgenderism, which are sometimes taken as offensive for seeming to imply a belief system or agenda). For additional guidance on -ist/-ism terms, see § Contentious labels, above.