Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
United States v. Google Inc., No. 3:12-cv-04177 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2012), is a case in which the United States District Court for the Northern District of California approved a stipulated order for a permanent injunction and a $22.5 million civil penalty judgment, the largest civil penalty the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has ever won in history. [1]
It's good practice to add categories for the specific kinds of case law the case represents. The categorization structure is a mess, but Category:United States federal case law is pretty much top-level. The template automatically adds the appropriate Chief Justice category, but remember that not all of their tenures were contiguous. Sometimes ...
Full case name: full name FullName: The full name of the case, including terms like "& Anor" ("and another") or "& Ors" ("and others"). Set out here any abbreviations that appear in the short name of the case in full. String: suggested: ArgueDate: ArgueDate: no description. String: optional: ArgueDateB: ArgueDateB: no description. String ...
It automatically switches between two URL formats, the short format used for cases prior to 16-1083, and the longer format used for later cases. The template takes two positional parameters, the first and second half of the docket number. Users who wish to provide the full docket number with the hyphen should see Template:SCOTUS URL Docket instead.
Cite the Docket to a US Federal District Court Case, and optionally link to Recap free archive and/or PACER non-free current Docket. Template parameters [Edit template data] Parameter Description Type Status Lead Plaintiff plaintiff Short name for Lead Plaintiff Example CREW String required Lead Defendant defendant Short name for Lead Defendant Example Trump String required Case Name case ...
The full case name should try to include the first and last names of all parties and whatever other information is included in the full name of the case [Bowers v. Hardwick]. For example, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General of Georgia v. Michael Hardwick, et al.
The suit says Strum was employed by Avenue Capital from 2009 to 2013 but worked as a consultant on occasion in the years that followed. Strum’s LinkedIn lists her employment with Avenue Capital ...
Google, Inc. [5] The court said that the chart showed: "As the following hypothetical [case] (articulated by Google, and not meaningfully distinguished by Walker) shows, these steps can and routinely are performed by, for example, human job headhunters." This is the chart from the Walker Digital case: