When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: allahabad high court case order status

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Allahabad High Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allahabad_High_Court

    On 25 February 1948, the Chief Court of Oudh was amalgamated with the High Court of Allahabad. Until 2000, what is now called Uttarakhand was part of Uttar Pradesh, and was therefore subject to the jurisdiction of Allahabad High Court. When the new state was created, Allahabad High Court ceased to have jurisdiction over the districts in it.

  3. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Raj Narain - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Uttar_Pradesh_v...

    Raj Narain (1975 AIR 865, 1975 SCR (3) 333) was a 1975 case heard by the Allahabad High Court that found the Prime Minister of India Indira Gandhi guilty of electoral malpractices. The ruling on the case that had been filed by the defeated opposition candidate, Raj Narain , Justice Jagmohanlal Sinha invalidated Gandhi's win and barred her from ...

  4. 2024 Sambhal violence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Sambhal_Violence

    On November 29, 2024, the Supreme Court directed the Sambhal Trial Court to pause proceedings against the Shahi Jama Masjid until the Allahabad High Court hears the Masjid Committee's challenge to a survey order. The Court ordered the survey report to remain sealed and emphasized maintaining peace in the region. [32] [33] The Uttar Pradesh ...

  5. Sultana Mirza v. State of Uttar Pradesh - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sultana_Mirza_v._State_of...

    In the related case of Poonam Rani v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2021), a same-sex couple residing together, approached the Allahabad High Court seeking protection against threat to their life and liberty by family members and the immediate society. In contrast to the Sultana Mirza v.

  6. 2019 Supreme Court verdict on Ayodhya dispute - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Supreme_Court_verdict...

    The Allahabad High Court bench began hearing the case in 2002, which was completed in 2010. After the Supreme Court of India dismissed a plea to defer the High Court verdict, [ 9 ] on 30 September 2010, the High Court of Allahabad, the three-member bench comprising justices S. U. Khan, Sudhir Agarwal and D. V. Sharma, ruled that the disputed ...

  7. Ayodhya dispute - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayodhya_dispute

    The Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha and Uttar Pradesh Sunni Central Waqf Board moved to the Supreme Court of India, challenging part of the Allahabad High Court's verdict. [123] [124] 2011: 9 May: Supreme Court of India stayed the High Court order splitting the disputed site in three parts and said that status quo will remain. 2019 6 August

  8. Uttar Pradesh sand mining scandal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uttar_Pradesh_sand_mining...

    The Uttar Pradesh illegal sand mining scam is a political scandal relating to events that occurred in 2012–2017 during the Samajwadi Party (SP) rule. It is being investigated by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on the 2016 orders of Allahabad High Court for allowing illegal mining in 7 districts of Uttar Pradesh – Shamli, Hamirpur, Fatehpur, Siddharthnagar, Deoria, Kaushambi and ...

  9. 2006 Noida serial murders - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Noida_serial_murders

    The book offered alternate viewpoints to the case, suggesting that the Noida Police botched the investigation and that Pandher and Koli were innocent; it also discussed the possibility of an organ-trafficking nexus. In 2023, much of this was corroborated when the Allahabad High Court acquitted Pandher and Koli, referring to a "botched up probe ...