Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In re: High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation (U.S. District Court, Northern District of California 11-cv-2509 [10]) is a class-action lawsuit on behalf of over 64,000 employees of Adobe, Apple Inc., Google, Intel, Intuit, Pixar and Lucasfilm (the last two are subsidiaries of Disney) against their employer alleging that their wages were ...
Some jurisdictions mandate disclosure of executive compensation to shareholders, in an attempt to reduce excessive compensation. According to a 2024 review of existing evidence, pay transparency within a firm tends to narrow coworker wage gaps, but also incentivizes employers to bargain more aggressively to keep average wages down.
Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on how two federal laws, the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), relate to whether employment contracts can legally bar employees from collective arbitration.
If you were affected, you can file a claim at this site with your computer’s serial number and proof of repairs. Synchrony Bank Total settlement: $2.6 million.
No Fly List#ACLU lawsuit [broken anchor] Oath of Citizenship (Canada)#Public action; Pacific Seafood#Incidents; Panera Bread#Lawsuits; Pefloxacin#Current litigation; PlayStation 3 system software#Class action suit filed over update 3.0; PlayStation 3 system software#Class action suits filed over update 3.21; PlayStation Network outage#Legal ...
Executive Order 11246, signed by President Lyndon B. Johnson, was an executive order of the Article II branch of the United States federal government, in place from 1965 to 2025, specifying non-discriminatory practices and affirmative action in federal government hiring and employment.
The U.S. Justice Department has launched a probe into UnitedHealth's Medicare billing practices in recent months, the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday, sending the healthcare conglomerate's ...
Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, 523 U.S. 75 (1998), is a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court.The case arose out of a suit for sex discrimination by a male oil-rig worker, who claimed that he was repeatedly subjected to sexual harassment by his male co-workers with the acquiescence of his employer.