When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: nissan website lawsuit settlement

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Nissan Motors v. Nissan Computer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_Motors_v._Nissan...

    Nissan Motors considered Nissan Computer's use of the name to be trademark dilution, and laid claim to the domain by alleging cyber squatting. However, Nissan Computer was named after its owner, Uzi Nissan. [16] [17] [18] Following the outcome of the case, Nissan Motors uses the name nissanusa.com for its U.S. website. [19]

  3. Claim Your Money From All These Class Action Settlements ...

    www.aol.com/claim-money-class-action-settlements...

    Facebook recently paid 1.4 million Illinois residents $397 in 2022 as part of a class action lawsuit for facial recognition breaches through its “Tag Suggestions” feature, per CNBC.

  4. Nissan owners might be entitled to $500 as part of a class ...

    www.aol.com/news/2017-08-09-nissan-owners-owed...

    The owners of select Nissan automobiles may be entitled to multiple forms of compensation, including a $500 payment, use of a rental car and an extended warranty, after the company agreed to pay ...

  5. These Companies Paid Massive Sums to Settle Lawsuits - AOL

    www.aol.com/26-biggest-lawsuit-settlements...

    The settlement aims to clear nearly 100,000 lawsuits filed by consumers ranging from homeowners to farmers who say they developed cancer because of the product. Some 25,000 cases still remain.

  6. Carlos Ghosn - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_Ghosn

    Carlos Ghosn at Nissan's Honmoku Wharf, a logistics hub about 10 km southeast of Nissan's global headquarters in Yokohama, July 2011. In 2007, Ghosn led the Renault–Nissan Alliance into the mass-market zero-emission electric car market in a major way, and committed €4 billion (more than $5 billion) to the effort.

  7. Bourke v. Nissan Motor Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bourke_v._Nissan_Motor_Co.

    Bourke v. Nissan Motor Corp., No. B068705 (Cal. Ct. App., July 26, 1993), was a California court case in which the Second Appellate District Court of the California Courts of Appeal upheld the original decision of the trial court in favor of the defendant, Nissan Motor Corporation, against the charges of the plaintiffs, who alleged wrongful termination, invasion of privacy, and violation of ...

  8. Nissan persuades US court to decertify brake defect ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/nissan-persuades-us-court...

    Nissan has plants in Smyrna and Decherd, Tennessee. The case is In re: Nissan North America Inc Litigation, 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 23-5950. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New ...

  9. Patent encumbrance of large automotive NiMH batteries

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patent_encumbrance_of...

    The 2011 Nissan Leaf had lower range and smaller battery capacity than the 1999 GM EV1. Nevertheless, it was a hit. The 1999 GM EV1 production vehicle, powered by nickel metal hydride batteries, had a 26.4 kWh battery and an EPA range of 105 miles. [9] [10] [note 1] The 2011 Nissan Leaf production vehicle had a 24 kWh battery and an EPA range ...