Ads
related to: faired well defined example in english grammar answer
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Grammatical well-formedness and semantic well-formedness do not always coincide. For example, the following sentence is grammatically well-formed, but has no clear meaning. Colorless green ideas sleep furiously. [2] The concept of well-formedness was developed in generative grammar during the twentieth century. [3]
For example, Chinese/English bilinguals at 7 years old perform just as well as Spanish/English bilinguals at 16 years old. [ 28 ] [ 29 ] This is due to the fact that a grammatical construction on an L2 that has a parallel structure in an L1 would impose less processing demand than one that does not have a parallel, causing a poorer performance ...
can back up [verb]) (can be) (can black out [verb]) (can breathe [verb]) (can check out [verb]) (can play back [verb]) (can set up [verb]) (can try out [verb])
Professor Whitney in his Essentials of English Grammar recommends the German original stating "there is an English version, but it is hardly to be used." (p. vi) Meyer-Myklestad, J. (1967). An Advanced English Grammar for Students and Teachers. Universitetsforlaget-Oslo. p. 627. Morenberg, Max (2002). Doing Grammar, 3rd edition. New York ...
Example: Abdul is happy. Jeanne is a person. I am she. Subject + Verb (transitive) + Indirect Object + Direct Object Example: She made me a pie. This clause pattern is a derivative of S+V+O, transforming the object of a preposition into an indirect object of the verb, as the example sentence in transformational grammar is actually "She made a ...
The grammar model discussed in Noam Chomsky's Syntactic Structures (1957) Chomsky's transformational grammar has three parts: phrase structure rules, transformational rules and morphophonemic rules. [68] The phrase structure rules are used for expanding lexical categories and for substitutions. These yield a string of morphemes. A ...
Using this grammar, the sequence of symbols (((p → q) ∧ (r → s)) ∨ (¬q ∧ ¬s)) is a formula, because it is grammatically correct. The sequence of symbols ((p → q)→(qq))p)) is not a formula, because it does not conform to the grammar. A complex formula may be difficult to read, owing to, for example, the proliferation of parentheses.
The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language distinguishes between an answer (being a member of the set of logically possible answers, as delineated in § Semantic classification) and a response (any statement made by the addressee in reply to the question). [1]