Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The resort to certiorari and prohibition was inappropriate. While certiorari under Rule 65 (in relation to Rule 64) applies only to acts of the Comelec in exercise of its quasi-judicial powers, Resolution 8678 was issued in the exercise of the Commission’s quasi-legislative functions.
Near v. Minnesota ex rel. Olson, 283 U.S. 697 (1931), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court under which prior restraint on publication was found to violate freedom of the press as protected under the First Amendment. This principle was applied to free speech generally in later jurisprudence.
In law, certiorari is a court process to seek judicial review of a decision of a lower court or government agency. Certiorari comes from the name of a prerogative writ in England, issued by a superior court to direct that the record of the lower court be sent to the superior court for review.
certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (9th Cir.) affirmed United States v. Glenn L. Martin Company: 308 U.S. 62 (1939) Black 8-0[a] none none certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (4th Cir.) reversed Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Company: 308 U.S. 66 (1939) Reed 8-0[a] none none
certiorari to the Supreme Court of the Philippines (Phil.) judgment affirmed Federal Trade Commission v. Klesner: 280 U.S. 19 (1929) Brandeis 9–0 none none certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.) judgment affirmed Sanitary Refrigerator Company v. Winters: 280 U.S. 30 (1929) Sanford 9–0 none none
certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (9th Cir.) judgment affirmed Gay v. Ruff: 292 U.S. 25 (1934) Brandeis 9-0 none none certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (5th Cir.) judgment affirmed A. Magnano Company v. Hamilton, Attorney General of Washington: 292 U.S. 40 (1934 ...
certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (D.C. Cir.) judgment reversed Burnet, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Harmel: 287 U.S. 103 (1932) Stone 9-0 none none certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (5th Cir.) judgment reversed Gebardi v. United States: 287 U.S. 112 (1932 ...
Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific-Atlanta, 552 U.S. 148 (2008), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court pertaining to the scope of liability of secondary actors, such as lawyers and accountants, for securities fraud under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.