Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
There is an analogous list for one-sided ideals, for which only the right-hand versions will be given. For a right ideal A of a ring R, the following conditions are equivalent to A being a maximal right ideal of R: There exists no other proper right ideal B of R so that A ⊊ B. For any right ideal B with A ⊆ B, either B = A or B = R.
If U is a right module over a ring, R, and I is a right ideal in R, then define U·I to be the set of all (finite) sums of elements of the form u·i, where · is simply the action of R on U. Necessarily, U·I is a submodule of U. If V is a maximal submodule of U, then U/V is simple.
A right ideal is defined similarly, with the condition replaced by . A two-sided ideal is a left ideal that is also a right ideal. If the ring is commutative, the three definitions are the same, and one talks simply of an ideal. In the non-commutative case, "ideal" is often used instead of "two-sided ideal".
For a general ring with unity R, the Jacobson radical J(R) is defined as the ideal of all elements r ∈ R such that rM = 0 whenever M is a simple R-module.That is, = {=}. This is equivalent to the definition in the commutative case for a commutative ring R because the simple modules over a commutative ring are of the form R / for some maximal ideal of R, and the annihilators of R / in R are ...
It is known that the endomorphism ring End R M is a semilocal ring which is very close to a local ring in the sense that End R M has at most two maximal right ideals. If M is assumed to be Artinian or Noetherian, then End R M is a local ring. Since rings with unity always have a maximal right ideal, a right uniserial ring is necessarily local.
For noncommutative rings, the analogues for maximal left ideals and maximal right ideals also hold. For pseudo-rings, the theorem holds for regular ideals. An apparently slightly stronger (but equivalent) result, which can be proved in a similar fashion, is as follows: Let R be a ring, and let I be a proper ideal of R.
In rings with unity, minimal right ideals are necessarily principal right ideals, because for any nonzero x in a minimal right ideal N, the set xR is a nonzero right ideal of R inside N, and so xR = N. Brauer's lemma: Any minimal right ideal N in a ring R satisfies N 2 = {0} or N = eR for some idempotent element e of R (Lam 2001, p. 162). If N ...
It is also a fact that the intersection of all maximal right ideals in a ring is the same as the intersection of all maximal left ideals in the ring, in the context of all rings; irrespective of whether the ring is commutative. Noncommutative rings are an active area of research due to their ubiquity in mathematics.