When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: lost pets in custody california family law child custody texas

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Why are custody battles over pets on the rise? - AOL

    www.aol.com/why-custody-battles-over-pets...

    24/7 Help. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726

  3. ‘You can’t cut the dog in half’: Pet custody disputes are ...

    www.aol.com/t-cut-dog-half-pet-053301423.html

    “We have laws on how to resolve child custody disputes but not specific laws when it comes to dogs or cats. Pets are part of people’s families.” If a couple doesn’t have a pet-nup in place ...

  4. Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Child_Custody...

    The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) is a Uniform Act drafted by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws in 1997. [1] The UCCJEA has since been adopted by 49 U.S. States, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

  5. Child custody laws in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_custody_laws_in_the...

    In the decades leading up to the 1970s child custody battles were rare, and in most cases the mother of minor children would receive custody. [5] Since the 1970s, as custody laws have been made gender-neutral, contested custody cases have increased as have cases in which the children are placed in the primary custody of the father. [5]

  6. Jeff Younger–Anne Georgulas custody battle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Younger–Anne...

    In 2022, Younger petitioned the Supreme Court of Texas to block Georgulas from moving with the children to California (which had recently passed a "trans sanctuary state" bill), but the court dismissed his petition. In 2024, a California judge awarded Georgulas full custody and medical authority over their daughter.

  7. Palmore v. Sidoti - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palmore_v._Sidoti

    Palmore v. Sidoti, 466 U.S. 429 (1984) was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States.The decision rejected the consideration of racial bias in child custody proceedings as unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment. [1]