Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
{{is leap year|year}} year defaults to {{CURRENTYEAR}} (2025). It must be specified in the Gregorian calendar, extended to all epochs using linear year numbering: use the proleptic Gregorian calendar in Christian Era before the change, and the astronomical year convention (using negative numbers, and year 0) in all years BC before the Christian era (there's a difference of 1 in absolute value).
{{IsLeapYear|year}} year defaults to {{CURRENTYEAR}} (2024). It must be specified in the Gregorian calendar, extended to all epochs using linear year numbering: use the proleptic Gregorian calendar in Christian Era before the change, and the astronomical year convention (using negative numbers, and year 0) in all years BC before the Christian era (there's a difference of 1 in absolute value).
Happy birthday! This year, Leap Day is Thursday, Feb. 29, 2024. If you were born on Leap Day 1924, you would be 100 years old or 25 in Leap Day years.
That calculation produced too many leap years because Earth’s trip around the sun is 365.242 days. The Julian calendar ended up being 11 minutes and 14 seconds longer than the tropical year ...
A year may be a leap year if it is evenly divisible by 4. Years divisible by 100 (century years such as 1900 or 2000) cannot be leap years unless they are also divisible by 400. (For this reason ...
{{IsLeapYear|year}} year defaults to {{CURRENTYEAR}} (2025). It must be specified in the Gregorian calendar, extended to all epochs using linear year numbering: use the proleptic Gregorian calendar in Christian Era before the change, and the astronomical year convention (using negative numbers, and year 0) in all years BC before the Christian era (there's a difference of 1 in absolute value).
Lotus 1-2-3 assumes that 1900 is a leap year. This is incorrect as while 1900 is a year that is divisible by four, years divisible by 100 are not counted as leap years unless divisible by 400. [ 90 ] This bug persists today as its competitor, Microsoft Excel, still incorporates the bug to ensure compatibility with legacy Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheets.
The ability to leverage these functions for date arithmetic has massively simplified many of the date arithmetic templates. Just my two cents. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:48, 1 May 2011 (UTC) In this case I can't see how this could be faster, since it's executing the exact same arithmetic operations as the template had before.