Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
A code of practice is adopted by a profession (or by a governmental or non-governmental organization) to regulate that profession. A code of practice may be styled as a code of professional responsibility, which will discuss difficult issues and difficult decisions that will often need to be made, and then provide a clear account of what behavior is considered "ethical" or "correct" or "right ...
Professional responsibility is defined by professional accepted standards of personal behaviour, moral values, and personal guiding principles. [16] Codes for professional responsibility may be established by professional bodies or organizations to guide members in performing functions to a consistent ethical set of principles. [ 17 ]
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate; Pages for logged out editors learn more
Professional responsibility; Duties to the client; Confidentiality; Avoiding conflict of interest; Due diligence and Competence (law) Avoid commingling; Avoid self-dealing; Effective assistance; Avoid fee splitting; Withdrawal from representation; Duties to the court; Disclosure of perjury; Disclosure of adverse authority; Duties to the profession
{{google|1 pound in kilograms {{=}}}} 1 pound in kilograms = Use Template:= to add an = sign to trigger Google Calculator when necessary; that template cannot be substituted. {{google|1 pound in kilograms}} 1 pound in kilograms: Google may display Calculator results for some expressions even if they lack a trailing equals sign.
A company code of conduct is a set of rules which is commonly written for employees of a company, which protects the business and informs the employees of the company's expectations. It is appropriate for even the smallest of companies to create a document containing important information on expectations for employees. [ 1 ]
In cases where professional bodies regulate their own ethics, there are possibilities for such bodies to become self-serving and fail to follow their own ethical code when dealing with renegade members. This is particularly true of professions in which they have almost a complete monopoly on a particular area of knowledge.
The Code consisted of Canons, Ethical Considerations, and Disciplinary Rules, of which the first two were aspirational and only the third was mandatory. This forced judges and lawyers to sort through a maze of Canons and Ethical Considerations just to understand the Disciplinary Rule that controlled a particular ethical issue.