When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. R v Woollin - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Woollin

    Where the charge is murder and in the rare cases where the simple direction is not enough, the jury should be directed that they are not entitled to find the necessary intention, unless they feel sure that death or serious bodily harm was a virtual certainty (barring some unforeseen intervention) as a result of the defendant's actions and that ...

  3. Unintended consequences - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unintended_consequences

    An erosion gully in Australia caused by rabbits, an unintended consequence of their introduction as game animals. In the social sciences, unintended consequences (sometimes unanticipated consequences or unforeseen consequences, more colloquially called knock-on effects) are outcomes of a purposeful action that are not intended or foreseen.

  4. R v Nedrick - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Nedrick

    R v Nedrick [1986] EWCA Crim 2 is an English criminal law case dealing with mens rea in murder. The case is a cornerstone as it sets down the "virtual certainty test". It applies wherever a form of indirect (oblique) intention is apparent and the charge is one of murder, or other very specific intent.

  5. Homicide in English law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homicide_in_English_law

    However, following R v Woollin, [c 9] it is also possible for a jury to convict if they "feel sure that death or serious injury was a virtual certainty (barring some unforeseen intervention) as a result of the defendant's actions and that the defendant appreciated that such was the case" – known as "oblique intent".

  6. Intention in English law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intention_in_English_law

    Judges normally do not define intention for juries, and the weight of authority is to give it its current meaning in everyday language as directed by the House of Lords in R v Moloney, [1] where can be found references to a number of definitions of intention using subjective and objective tests, and knowledge of consequences of actions or omissions.

  7. Barring out - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barring_out

    Barred Out, by Ralph Hedley (1896). Barring out is the former custom in British schools of barring a schoolmaster from the premises.. A typical example of this practice was at the school in Bromfield, Cumbria, [1] where it was the custom "for the scholars, at Fasting's Even (the beginning of Lent) to depose and exclude the master from the school for three days."

  8. Act of God - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_of_God

    In legal usage in the English-speaking world, an act of God, act of nature, or damnum fatale ("loss arising from inevitable accident") is an event caused by no direct human action (e.g. severe or extreme weather and other natural disasters) for which individual persons are not responsible and cannot be held legally liable for loss of life, injury, or property damage.

  9. Program evaluation and review technique - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Program_Evaluation_and...

    Barring any unforeseen events, the project should take 19.51 work days to complete. The next step is to determine the late start (LS) and late finish (LF) of each activity. This will eventually show if there are activities that have slack. The LF is defined as the minimum LS of all successor activities, unless the activity is the last activity ...