Ad
related to: kitco sjc v n g p lorimer pty ltd
Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Norfolk Southern Ry. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd., 543 U.S. 14 (2004), was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the extent to which maritime bills of lading cover non-maritime portions of a shipment, together with connected clauses for exclusion of liability.
The Supreme Court of NSW in Mainteck Services Pty Ltd v Stein Heurtey SA, [19] supported the conclusion that Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society, [4] had been accepted in Australian law, therefore, ambiguity did not have to be pointed to before referring to 'surrounding circumstances'.
In April 2007, a 75% shareholding in P&O Automotive & General Stevedoring and 50% shareholding in P&O Trans Australia were acquired from DP World. [2] In June 2010, the KFM Diversified Infrastructure & Logistics Fund was renamed Qube Logistics. [3] [4] [5] In April 2011, Qube exercised an option to take its ownership in P&O Trans Australia up ...
Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia [1998] HCA 30 is an Australian labour law case in the High Court which culminated the legal aspects of the 1998 Australian waterfront dispute, in which a major stevedoring operation, the Patrick group of companies, sought to replace its largely unionised workforce with a non-union workforce.
In Southernport Developments (Pty) Ltd (Previously Known as Tsogo Sun Ebhayi (Pty) Ltd) v Transnet Ltd, an important case in the South African law of lease, Transnet excepted to Southernport Developments' particulars of claim on the ground that it disclosed no cause of action. The particulars of claim required Transnet to enter into good-faith ...
Huddart, Parker & Co Pty Ltd v Moorehead [1] is a leading decision by the High Court of Australia that dealt with two issues under the Australian Constitution, the identification and extent of judicial power that is vested in the courts and the corporations power of the Parliament.
Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd v IceTV Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1172. Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd v IceTV Pty Ltd [2008] FCAFC 71; (2008) 168 FCR 14. Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd v IceTV Pty Ltd [No 2] [2008] FCAFC 154: Court membership; Judges sitting: French CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Heydon, Crennan and Kiefel JJ: Case opinions; Appeal allowed.
An appeal against the assessment by BP to the County Court was dismissed, as was an appeal to the Supreme Court of Victoria.The Supreme Court held that under the Local Government Act the Shire of Hastings could only validly make an agreement with a particular ratepayer for specified land, and not any person who might subsequently become the ratepayer.