When.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: phone number fraud uk law cases

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. 2022 iSpoof fraud investigation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_iSpoof_fraud...

    ispoof.cc was a website used by many people to make unauthorised phone calls while displaying a caller ID falsely indicating that they were legitimate callers. In 2021 and 2022 it was part of an investigation by numerous law enforcement agencies into frauds enabled by this caller ID spoofing. It was shut down in November 2022 as the result of ...

  3. Fraud Act 2006 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraud_Act_2006

    Fraud Act 2006. An Act to make provision for, and in connection with, criminal liability for fraud and obtaining services dishonestly. The Fraud Act 2006 (c 35) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which affects England and Wales and Northern Ireland. It was given royal assent on 8 November 2006, and came into effect on 15 January ...

  4. News International phone hacking scandal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/News_International_phone...

    A small number of victims of phone hacking engaged solicitors and made civil claims for invasion of privacy. By March 2010, News International had spent over £2 million settling court cases with victims of phone hacking. As information about these claims leaked out, The Guardian continued to follow the story.

  5. Phone fraud - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phone_fraud

    Phone fraud. Phone fraud, or more generally communications fraud, is the use of telecommunications products or services with the intention of illegally acquiring money from, or failing to pay, a telecommunication company or its customers. Many operators have increased measures to minimize fraud and reduce their losses.

  6. R v Ingram, C., Ingram, D. and Whittock, T. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Ingram,_C.,_Ingram,_D...

    R v Ingram, C., Ingram, D. and Whittock, T. was a 2003 English Crown Court fraud case in which Major Charles Ingram, his wife Diana and college lecturer Tecwen Whittock were found guilty of procuring the execution of a valuable security by deception—obtaining a signed cheque for £1 million—by cheating on the filming of the UK game show Who Wants to Be a Millionaire?

  7. Derry v Peek - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derry_v_Peek

    Derry v Peek [1889] UKHL 1 is a case on English contract law, fraudulent misstatement, and the tort of deceit. Derry v Peek established a 3-part test for fraudulent misrepresentation, [1] whereby the defendant is fraudulent if he: (i) knows the statement to be false, [2] or. (ii) does not believe in the statement, [3] or.

  8. Benefit fraud in the United Kingdom - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benefit_fraud_in_the...

    Where cases of benefit fraud result in criminal prosecution, in England & Wales such prosecutions are generally brought either under section 112 Social Security Administration Act 1992 (where no dishonesty is alleged) or under s111A of the same Act (where dishonesty is alleged). There are a number of legal cases relevant to prosecutions under ...

  9. Royscot Trust Ltd v Rogerson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royscot_Trust_Ltd_v_Rogerson

    Royscot Trust Ltd v Rogerson [1991] EWCA Civ 12 is an English contract law case on misrepresentation. It examines the Misrepresentation Act 1967 and addresses the extent of damages available under s 2 (1) for negligent misrepresentation. The court controversially decided that under the Act, the appropriate measure of damages was the same as ...