Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Repin began working on the painting in Moscow. [1] A first overall sketch, with the character of the Tsar turned to his right, dates from 1882. The idea of the painting, according to Repin, is linked to his confrontation with the themes of violence, revenge and blood during the political events of 1881; additional sources of inspiration were the music of Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov and the ...
Ivan Ivanovich was killed by his father in a fit of rage, [5] with the argument ending after the elder Ivan fatally struck his son in the head with his pointed staff. [6] Yelena also suffered a miscarriage within hours of the incident. [4] The event is depicted in the famous painting by Ilya Repin, Ivan the Terrible and His Son Ivan.
Historians generally believe that Ivan killed his son in a fit of rage, [7] with the argument ending after the elder Ivan fatally struck his son in the head with his pointed staff. [70] Yelena also suffered a miscarriage within hours of the incident. [69] The event is depicted in the famous painting by Ilya Repin, Ivan the Terrible and His Son ...
The work of art itself is in the public domain for the following reason: Public domain Public domain false false This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer .
This painting, depicting the tsar, his face full of horror, just after he has killed his son with his sceptre in a demented rage. It caused a scandal. It caused a scandal. Some critics saw it as a veiled criticism of Tsar Alexander III , who had brutally suppressed the opposition after a failed assassination attempt.
However, Tsarevich Ivan was allegedly killed in anger by his father on 19 November 1581, making Feodor the new heir apparent. According to Chester Dunning, "Tsar Ivan knew perfectly well that Fedor could not rule on his own; before his own death in 1584, he set up a council of regents to govern in his son's name.
Western sources from the time give figures ranging from 2,700 to 27,000 killed. Modern researchers estimate the number of victims in a range from 2,500 up to 12,000. Ruslan Skrynnikov , reconstructing the sinodiki (prayer lists) of the Kirillo-Belozersky Monastery , found only 1,505 named victims of the massacre, although these were most likely ...
The whole of the Act 1 is based upon one small fragment in Vol.IX of it describing Ioann's feelings after the killing of his son, his relinquishing the throne, boyars' reaction to this and his consent to (as he put it) "bear this burden of rule for some more time" [7] Details of this fragment of History have been expanded by Tolstoy into full ...