Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
There is catena of judgments mentioning about the scope of power of Supreme Court under Article 136, the maintainability of special leave petitions. The below mentioned are some of prominent judgments mentioning about SLP. Pritam Singh v. the State [AIR 1950 SC 169] [3] Kunhayammed vs. State of Kerala (2000) 245 ITR 360 (SC) [4]
Around 80% of special leave applications are decided by the High Court without an oral hearing. [3] Nearly all of these are dismissed. Special leave applications in the High Court are typically an extremely complex and expensive process. Legal practitioners who have experience in the special leave process are highly prized, and barristers with a proven ability to successfu
The Curative Petition is the last chance available for the protection from the compensation of injustice in the court after the review petition is dismissed or has been exhausted. It is a concept that evolved by the Supreme Court of India in the matter of Rupa Ashok Hurra vs. Ashok Hurra and Anr.
The petitioner's counsel has filed a special leave petition, seeking to contest the interim orders issued by the Kerala High Court on 13th January 2023, and 2nd February 2023, raising legal questions concerning the validity of 'conversion therapy,' and whether the High Court should have facilitated the alleged detainee's opportunity to provide ...
A motion or application for leave is a motion filed with the court seeking permission to deviate from an established rule or procedure of the court. [ 1 ] The most common use of a motion for leave is to seek an extension to an already-passed time frame to amend a court pleading , which is allowed once under the Federal Rules of Criminal ...
The petition was signed by prisoners of the Bihar jail and the case was filed in the Supreme Court of India before the bench headed by Justice P. N. Bhagwati. The petition was filed under the name of a prisoner, Hussainara Khatoon, and the case was therefore named Hussainara Khatoon Vs State of Bihar. The Supreme Court decided that prisoners ...
Gandhi filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order on the grounds that it violated Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution. The Union responded in their written submissions that her passport was impounded because her presence was likely to be required in connection with legal proceedings before ...
The rejected certiorari petition was Dickson's first in this Court, and one can only speculate as to whether denial of that petition would have been a foregone conclusion." [ 9 ] Once a request for a writ of certiorari has been filed, the respondents may choose to file a brief in opposition to the request within 30 days (this too can be granted ...