Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
United Nations Security Council resolution 252, [1] adopted on 21 May 1968, after a letter from the Permanent Representative of Jordan, hearing statements from Israel and Jordan, and noting Israel's "further actions and measures in contravention" of General Assembly resolutions, [2] [3] the Council reaffirmed that the acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible and deplored ...
Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States: 251 U.S. 385 (1920) Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine in a tax evasion case Eisner v. Macomber: 252 U.S. 189 (1920) pro rata stock dividend not taxable income Missouri v. Holland: 252 U.S. 416 (1920) states’ rights United States v. Wheeler: 254 U.S. 281 (1920) Privileges and Immunities Clause and ...
CPM United Kingdom Ltd. [1] (full name Intel Corporation Inc. v. CPM United Kingdom Ltd.), case C-252/07, was a case of the European Court of Justice in which the ECJ interpreted the meaning of Article 4 (4)(a) of the EU Trade Marks Directive. The court considered what elements are required to show that a later mark was causing dilution to an ...
NEW YORK (Reuters) -Do Kwon, the South Korean cryptocurrency entrepreneur behind two digital currencies that lost an estimated $40 billion in 2022, pleaded not guilty on Thursday to U.S. criminal ...
Metropolitan Housing Development Corp, 429 U.S. 252 (1977), was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States dealing with a zoning ordinance that in a practical way barred families of various socio-economic, and ethno-racial backgrounds from residing in a neighborhood. The Court held that the ordinance was constitutional because there ...
The summary notice lists the address to use under the appeals information section. People can also send a written request rather than use the form. They must include the following:
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has filed a $2 billion lawsuit against Capital One, alleging that the bank deceived millions of consumers with their savings account offerings. The ...
The Court of Justice held that Plaumann & Co had no standing for judicial review of the Commission decision because the firm was not "individually concerned".. Persons other than those to whom a decision is addressed may only claim to be individually concerned if that decision affects them by reason of certain attributes which are peculiar to them or by reason of circumstances in which they ...