When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Pebble accretion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pebble_accretion

    The rapid growth via pebble accretion allows the cores to grow large enough to accrete massive gas envelopes forming gas giants while avoiding migrating very close to the star. In simulations, cold gas giants like Jupiter and Saturn can form via pebble accretion if their initial embryos began growing beyond 20 AU. This distant formation offers ...

  3. Accretion (astrophysics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accretion_(astrophysics)

    Pebble accretion may accelerate the formation of planets by a factor of 1000 compared to the accretion of planetesimals, allowing giant planets to form before the dissipation of the gas disk. [28] [29] However, core growth via pebble accretion appears incompatible with the final masses and compositions of Uranus and Neptune. [30]

  4. Nebular hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebular_hypothesis

    In this model giant planet formation is divided into two stages: a) accretion of a core of approximately 10 M E and b) accretion of gas from the protoplanetary disk. [2] [22] [67] Either method may also lead to the creation of brown dwarfs. [31] [68] Searches as of 2011 have found that core accretion is likely the dominant formation mechanism. [68]

  5. Grand tack hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Tack_Hypothesis

    Jupiter might have shaped the Solar System on its grand tack. In planetary astronomy, the grand tack hypothesis proposes that Jupiter formed at a distance of 3.5 AU from the Sun, then migrated inward to 1.5 AU, before reversing course due to capturing Saturn in an orbital resonance, eventually halting near its current orbit at 5.2 AU.

  6. History of Solar System formation and evolution hypotheses

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Solar_System...

    The capture model fails to explain the similarity in these isotopes (if the Moon had originated in another part of the Solar System, those isotopes would have been different), while the co-accretion model cannot adequately explain the loss of water (if the Moon formed similarly to the Earth, the amount of water trapped in its mineral structure ...

  7. Accretion (meteorology) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accretion_(meteorology)

    Accretion is defined as the gradual collection of something over time. [1] In meteorology or atmospheric science it is the process of accumulation of frozen water as precipitation over time as it descends through the atmosphere, in particular when an ice crystal or snowflake hits a supercooled liquid droplet, which then freeze together, increasing the size of the water particle.

  8. Earth's crustal evolution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth's_crustal_evolution

    The anhydrous nature of the crust on Venus prevents it from sliding past each other, whereas through the study of oxygen isotopes, the presence of water on Earth can be confirmed from 4.3 Ga. [22] Thus, this model helps provide a mechanism for how plate tectonics could have been triggered on Earth, although it does not demonstrate that ...

  9. Origin of water on Earth - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_water_on_Earth

    However, the current understanding of Earth's formation allows for less than 1% of Earth's material accreting after the Moon formed, implying that the material accreted later must have been very water-rich. Models of early Solar System dynamics have shown that icy asteroids could have been delivered to the inner Solar System (including Earth ...