When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamex_Operations_West...

    In Borello, the California Supreme Court found that while control over the work performed was the “most significant” factor in determining whether there was an employment relationship under an employment statute, it could not be applied “rigidly and in isolation.” [15] The Court went on to identify other “secondary” factors that ...

  3. Tyranny of the majority - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyranny_of_the_majority

    In social choice, a tyranny-of-the-majority scenario can be formally defined as a situation where the candidate or decision preferred by a majority is greatly inferior (hence "tyranny") to the socially optimal candidate or decision according to some measure of excellence such as total utilitarianism or the egalitarian rule.

  4. Friedman v. Rogers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedman_v._Rogers

    Friedman et al. v. Rogers et al., 440 U.S. 1 (1979) was a Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a Texas law, the Texas Optometry Act, which prohibited optometrists from using trade names for commercial purposes and which requires that 4/6 of the members of the Texas Optometry Board be members of the Texas Optometric Association is constitutional.

  5. California superior courts - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Superior_Courts

    The paradox of state judicial officers working in county-operated organizations culminated in a 1996 case in which the Supreme Court of California upheld the constitutionality of a statute under which the superior court of Mendocino County was bound by the county board of supervisors' designation of unpaid furlough days for all county employees ...

  6. How will California's workplace laws change in 2022? More ...

    www.aol.com/news/californias-workplace-laws...

    New workplace laws taking effect in January strengthening employees' health, safety and wage protections and ban corporate muzzling of discrimination victims. But many more mandates tagged "job ...

  7. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol-Myers_Squibb_Co._v...

    Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that California courts lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant on claims brought by plaintiffs who are not California residents and did not suffer their alleged injury in California. [1]

  8. California utility faces billions in claims for fire damage ...

    www.aol.com/news/california-utility-faces...

    California lawmakers have created a wildfire insurance fund with access to $21 billion that is meant to ensure that Southern California Edison remains solvent and victims' claims are paid in full.

  9. Activision Blizzard to pay $54 million to settle California ...

    www.aol.com/news/activision-blizzard-pay-54...

    Activision Blizzard has agreed to pay about $54 million to settle discrimination claims brought by California's civil rights agency on behalf of women employed by the video game maker. The ...