When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Stakeholder (corporate) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stakeholder_(corporate)

    Real stakeholders, labelled stakeholders: genuine stakeholders with a legitimate stake, the loyal partners who strive for mutual benefits. Stake owners own and deserve a stake in the firm. Stakeholder reciprocity could be an innovative criterion in the corporate governance debate as to who should be accorded representation on the board.

  3. Constituency statute - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constituency_statute

    A constituency statute is a term in US corporate law for a rule that requires a board of directors to pay regard to the interests of all corporate stakeholders in their decision making. A constituency statute is intended to give directors of corporations the discretion to balance the interests of stakeholders, rather than have to solely focus ...

  4. Stakeholders vs. shareholders: What’s the difference?

    www.aol.com/finance/stakeholders-vs-shareholders...

    All shareholders are stakeholders, but not all stakeholders are shareholders.

  5. 3Cs model - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3Cs_model

    Clients are the base of any strategy according to Ohmae. Therefore, the primary goal is supposed to be the interest of the customer and not those of the shareholders for example. In the long run, a company that is genuinely interested in its customers will be interesting for its investors and take care of their interests automatically.

  6. Dodge v. Ford Motor Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_v._Ford_Motor_Co.

    Dodge v. Ford Motor Co., 204 Mich 459; 170 NW 668 (1919), [1] is a case in which the Michigan Supreme Court held that Henry Ford had to operate the Ford Motor Company in the interests of its shareholders, rather than in a manner for the benefit of his employees or customers.

  7. Shlensky v. Wrigley - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shlensky_v._Wrigley

    Shlensky v Wrigley, 237 NE 2d 776 (Ill. App. 1968) is a leading US corporate law case concerning the board's discretion to determine how to balance stakeholders' interests. The case embraces the application of the business judgment rule to directors' good-faith judgments about long-term shareholder value. [ 1 ]

  8. United States corporate law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_corporate_law

    The risk of allowing individual shareholders to bring derivative suits is usually thought to be that it could encourage costly, distracting litigation, or "strike suits" [165] – or simply that litigation (even if the director is guilty of a breach of duty) could be seen as counterproductive by a majority of shareholders or stakeholders who ...

  9. Nexus of contracts - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nexus_of_contracts

    The nexus of contracts theory is an idea put forth by a number of economists and legal commentators (most notably Michael Jensen and William Meckling as well as Frank Easterbrook) which asserts that corporations are a collection of contracts between different parties – primarily shareholders, directors, employees, suppliers, and customers.