Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Certiorari was granted in the case and the companion case Johnson v.Arteaga-Martinez on August 23, 2021. The court also asked for briefing in Gonzalez on the question of whether a separate provision of the statute stripped the lower courts over the jurisdiction necessary to issue a class-wide injunction.
Velazquez v. Bondi (Docket No. 23-929), previously called Velazquez v.Garland, is a pending United States Supreme Court case on whether a 60-day voluntary departure period that ends on a weekend or public holiday is automatically extended to the following business day for the purposes of filing a post-decision motion to reopen or reconsider immigration removal proceedings.
(Reuters) -The largest U.S. government workers' union and an association of foreign service workers sued the Trump administration on Thursday in an effort to reverse its aggressive dismantling of ...
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Two separate groups of FBI employees sued the U.S. Justice Department on Tuesday, seeking to protect the identities of those agents and others who investigated supporters of ...
Geofroy v. Riggs, 133 U.S. 258 (1890) In re Ross, 140 U.S. 453 (1891) Nishimura Ekiu v. United States, 142 U.S. 651 (1892) Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States, 143 U.S. 457 (1892) Lau Ow Bew v. United States, 144 U.S. 47 (1892) Fong Yue Ting v. United States, 149 U.S. 698 (1893) Lem Moon Sing v. United States, 158 U.S. 538 (1895) Wong ...
Alas, the Bills were penalized 10 yards and faced second-and-21 at their own 43-yard line instead of third-and-3 at the Baltimore 39. They punted two downs later after failing to secure a first down.
Velazques v. Garland (Docket No. 23-929) is a pending United States Supreme Court case on whether a 60-day voluntary departure period that ends on a weekend or public holiday is automatically extended to the following business day for the purposes of filing a post-decision motion to reopen or reconsider immigration removal proceedings.
At the conclusion of the trial, Narcy and Veliz were each convicted of murder, conspiracy to commit murder, domestic violence, stalking, money laundering, and witness tampering. Narcy waived her right to appear in court when the guilty verdict was read. She also did not appear in court when she was sentenced to life in prison without parole. [9]