When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: wikipedia submission for review of related literature

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Literature review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literature_review

    A literature review is an overview of the previously published works on a topic. The term can refer to a full scholarly paper or a section of a scholarly work such as a book, or an article. Either way, a literature review is supposed to provide the researcher /author and the audiences with a general image of the existing knowledge on the topic ...

  3. Scholarly peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review

    Scholarly peer review or academic peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of having a draft version of a researcher's methods and findings reviewed (usually anonymously) by experts (or "peers") in the same field. Peer review is widely used for helping the academic publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief, the editorial board or the ...

  4. Peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review

    Peer review is the evaluation of work by one or more people with similar competencies as the producers of the work (peers). [1] It functions as a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field. Peer review methods are used to maintain quality standards, improve performance, and provide credibility.

  5. Review of Educational Research - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Review_of_Educational_Research

    The Review of Educational Research is a bimonthly peer-reviewed review journal published by SAGE Publications on behalf of the American Educational Research Association. It was established in 1931 and covers all aspects of education and educational research. The journal's co-editors are Mildred Boveda, Karly Sarita Ford, Erica Frankenberg, and ...

  6. Wikipedia:Peer review/Guidelines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/...

    Wikipedia's peer review is a way to receive ideas on how to improve articles that are already decent. It may be used for potential good article nominations, potential featured article candidates, or an article of any " grade " (but if the article isn't well-developed, please read here before asking for a peer review).

  7. Systematic review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systematic_review

    A systematic review is a scholarly synthesis of the evidence on a clearly presented topic using critical methods to identify, define and assess research on the topic. [1] A systematic review extracts and interprets data from published studies on the topic (in the scientific literature), then analyzes, describes, critically appraises and summarizes interpretations into a refined evidence-based ...

  8. Academic publishing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_publishing

    Academic publishing is the subfield of publishing which distributes academic research and scholarship. Most academic work is published in academic journal articles, books or theses. The part of academic written output that is not formally published but merely printed up or posted on the Internet is often called "grey literature".

  9. Wikipedia:Peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review

    Wikipedia's peer review process is a feature where an editor can receive feedback from others on how to improve an article they are working on, or receive advice about a specific issue queried by the editor. The process helps users find ways for improvement that they themselves didn't pick up on. Compared to the real-world peer review process ...