Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
In computational complexity theory, the polynomial hierarchy (sometimes called the polynomial-time hierarchy) is a hierarchy of complexity classes that generalize the classes NP and co-NP. [1] Each class in the hierarchy is contained within PSPACE. The hierarchy can be defined using oracle machines or alternating Turing machines.
The class P #P consists of all the problems that can be solved in polynomial time if you have access to instantaneous answers to any counting problem in #P (polynomial time relative to a #P oracle). Thus Toda's theorem implies that for any problem in the polynomial hierarchy there is a deterministic polynomial-time Turing reduction to a ...
In computational complexity theory, the complexity class PH is the union of all complexity classes in the polynomial hierarchy: = PH was first defined by Larry Stockmeyer. [1] It is a special case of hierarchy of bounded alternating Turing machine.
If there is a polynomial-time algorithm for even one of them, then there is a polynomial-time algorithm for all the problems in NP. Because of this, and because dedicated research has failed to find a polynomial algorithm for any NP-complete problem, once a problem has been proven to be NP-complete, this is widely regarded as a sign that a ...
SO, unrestricted second-order logic, is equal to the Polynomial hierarchy PH. More precisely, we have the following generalisation of Fagin's theorem: The set of formulae in prenex normal form where existential and universal quantifiers of second order alternate k times characterise the kth level of the polynomial hierarchy. [17]
Because determined effort has yet to find a polynomial-time solution to any of these problems, it is suspected to be difficult to show P=UP, or even P=(UP ∩ co-UP). The Valiant–Vazirani theorem states that NP is contained in RP Promise-UP , which means that there is a randomized reduction from any problem in NP to a problem in Promise-UP .
M runs for polynomial time on all inputs; For all x in L, M outputs 1 with probability no less than 1/2; For all x not in L, M outputs 1 with probability strictly less than 1/2. Alternatively, PP can be defined using only deterministic Turing machines. A language L is in PP if and only if there exists a polynomial p and deterministic Turing ...
It runs in polynomial time on inputs that are in SUBSET-SUM if and only if P = NP: // Algorithm that accepts the NP-complete language SUBSET-SUM. // // this is a polynomial-time algorithm if and only if P = NP. // // "Polynomial-time" means it returns "yes" in polynomial time when // the answer should be "yes", and runs forever when it is "no".