When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Felony disenfranchisement in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felony_disenfranchisement...

    [citation needed] Felons who have completed their sentences are allowed to vote in most states. Between 1996 and 2008, 28 states changed their laws on felon voting rights, mostly to restore rights or to simplify the process of restoration. [17]

  3. Should felons in prison have voting rights? - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/should-felons-in-prison-have...

    Bernie Sanders made provocative comments about voting rights during a recent town hall, saying he thought felons — even those still imprisoned — should be granted the right to vote in elections.

  4. Ohio Issue 1: What is it, who is for it, and who is ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/ohio-issue-1-against-035900672.html

    If a certain party wins 55% of the vote in Ohio, 55% of Ohio's seats should lean toward that party. This is also known as proportionality, which makes districts more competitive. ... "When allowed ...

  5. Disfranchisement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disfranchisement

    Disfranchisement, also disenfranchisement (which has become more common since 1982) [1] or voter disqualification, is the restriction of suffrage (the right to vote) of a person or group of people, or a practice that has the effect of preventing someone from exercising the right to vote.

  6. Mapp v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mapp_v._Ohio

    Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Court ruled that the exclusionary rule, which prevents a prosecutor from using evidence that was obtained by violating the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, applies to states as well as the federal government.

  7. Some felons who are allowed to vote are staying away from the ...

    www.aol.com/news/felons-allowed-vote-staying...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  8. Richardson v. Ramirez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richardson_v._Ramirez

    Richardson v. Ramirez, 418 U.S. 24 (1974), [1] was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 6–3, that convicted felons could be barred from voting beyond their sentence and parole without violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.

  9. What yes or no vote really means for Ohio Issue 1 - AOL

    www.aol.com/yes-no-vote-really-means-093000900.html

    COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Ohioans voting in this November’s general election will be deciding whether to pass Issue 1, a proposed constitutional amendment to change how the state’s political ...