When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loper_Bright_Enterprises_v...

    While the FCC had previously been considered to have the ability to make such rulings under the Chevron deference as a result of National Cable & Telecommunications Ass'n v. Brand X Internet Services , the Sixth Circuit ruled in January 2025 that the FCC's rule making to support net neutrality was incompatible with the Telecommunications Act of ...

  3. List of overruled United States Supreme Court decisions

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_overruled_United...

    As of 2018, the Supreme Court had overruled more than 300 of its own cases. [1] The longest period between the original decision and the overruling decision is 136 years, for the common law Admiralty cases Minturn v. Maynard, 58 U.S. (17 How.) 476 decision in 1855, overruled by the Exxon Corp. v. Central Gulf Lines Inc., 500 U.S. 603 decision ...

  4. Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caperton_v._A.T._Massey...

    Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., 556 U.S. 868 (2009), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment requires judges to recuse themselves not only when actual bias has been demonstrated or when the judge has an economic interest in the outcome of the case but also when "extreme facts" create a "probability of bias."

  5. Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Enterprise_Fund_v...

    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, 561 U.S. 477 (2010), was a 5–4 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that laws enabling inferior officers of the United States to be insulated from the Presidential removal authority with two levels of "for cause" removal violated Article Two of the United States Constitution.

  6. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastman_Kodak_Co._v._Image...

    Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Servs., Inc., 504 U.S. 451 (1992), is a 1992 Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that even though an equipment manufacturer lacked significant market power in the primary market for its equipment—copier-duplicators and other imaging equipment—nonetheless, it could have sufficient market power in the secondary aftermarket for repair parts to ...

  7. McCarran–Ferguson Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarran–Ferguson_Act

    The McCarran–Ferguson Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1011-1015, is a United States federal law that exempts the business of insurance from most federal regulation, including federal antitrust laws to a limited extent. The 79th Congress passed the McCarran–Ferguson Act in 1945 after the Supreme Court ruled in United States v.

  8. Attorney General v Blake - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attorney_General_v_Blake

    The court considered and rejected various forms of relief. The actual damage was not quantifiable, nominal damages were a hollow alternative, and punitive damages after a jury trial would be speculative and unusual. Even if recovered they would bear no relation to either the government's irreparable loss or Snepp's unjust gain.

  9. Murphy v. IRS - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy_v._IRS

    Marrita Murphy and Daniel J. Leveille, Appellants v. Internal Revenue Service and United States of America, Appellees (commonly known as Murphy v.IRS), [1] is a tax case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit originally held that the taxation of emotional distress awards by the federal government is unconstitutional.