When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. The Common Topics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Common_Topics

    In classical rhetoric, the Common Topics were a short list of four traditional topics regarded as suitable to structure an argument. Four Traditional Topics [ edit ]

  3. Rhetorical modes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetorical_modes

    Examples are the satiric mode, the ironic, the comic, the pastoral, and the didactic. [ 2 ] Frederick Crews uses the term to mean a type of essay and categorizes essays as falling into four types, corresponding to four basic functions of prose: narration , or telling; description , or picturing; exposition , or explaining; and argument , or ...

  4. Essay - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essay

    Compare and contrast essays are characterized by a basis for comparison, points of comparison, and analogies. It is grouped by the object (chunking) or by point (sequential). The comparison highlights the similarities between two or more similar objects while contrasting highlights the differences between two or more objects.

  5. Contrast (literary) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contrast_(literary)

    For example, John Donne and the metaphysical poets developed the conceit as a literary device, where an elaborate, implausible, and surprising analogy was demonstrated. In Renaissance poetry, and particularly in sonnets, the contrast was similarly used as a poetic argument. In such verse, the entire poem argues that two seemingly alike or ...

  6. Rhetoric - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetoric

    The topics were thus a heuristic or inventional tool designed to help speakers categorize and thus better retain and apply frequently used types of argument. For example, since we often see effects as "like" their causes, one way to invent an argument (about a future effect) is by discussing the cause (which it will be "like").

  7. Contrast (linguistics) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contrast_(linguistics)

    This is, of course, a defeasible inference based on world knowledge, that is then contradicted in the following sentence. The majority of the studies done on contrast and contrastive relations in semantics has concentrated on characterizing exactly which semantic relationships could give rise to contrast.

  8. Hypernymy and hyponymy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypernymy_and_hyponymy

    For example, screwdriver, scissors, knife, and hammer are all co-hyponyms of one another and hyponyms of tool, but not hyponyms of one another: *"A hammer is a type of knife" is false. Co-hyponyms are often but not always related to one another by the relation of incompatibility. For example, apple, peach and plum are co-hyponyms of fruit.

  9. Strength training - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strength_training

    Common superset configurations are two exercises for the same muscle group, agonist-antagonist muscles, or alternating upper and lower body muscle groups. [29] Exercises for the same muscle group (flat bench press followed by the incline bench press) result in a significantly lower training volume than a traditional exercise format with rests. [30]