When.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: separate but equal

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Separate but equal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separate_but_equal

    Separate but equal was a legal doctrine in United States constitutional law, according to which racial segregation did not necessarily violate the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which nominally guaranteed "equal protection" under the law to all people.

  3. Plessy v. Ferguson: Separate But Equal Doctrine - HISTORY

    www.history.com/topics/black-history/plessy-v-ferguson

    Ferguson was a landmark 1896 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. The case stemmed from an 1892 incident in...

  4. separate but equal - Encyclopedia Britannica

    www.britannica.com/topic/separate-but-equal

    Separate but equal, the legal doctrine that once allowed for racial segregation in the United States. The doctrine held that so long as segregation laws affected white and Black people equally, those laws did not violate the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S.

  5. separate but equal | Wex | US Law - LII / Legal Information...

    www.law.cornell.edu/wex/separate_but_equal

    Separate but equal” refers to the infamously racist decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) that allowed the use of segregation laws by states and local governments.

  6. Plessy v. Ferguson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plessy_v._Ferguson

    Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision ruling that racial segregation laws did not violate the U.S. Constitution as long as the facilities for people of color were equal in quality to those of white people, a doctrine that came to be known as "separate but equal".

  7. Plessy v. Ferguson | Summary, Ruling, Background, & Impact |...

    www.britannica.com/event/Plessy-v-Ferguson

    Plessy v. Ferguson, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on May 18, 1896, by a seven-to-one majority (one justice did not participate), advanced the controversial ‘separate but equal’ doctrine for assessing the constitutionality of racial segregation laws.

  8. Definition of Separate but Equal. Noun. The doctrine which stated that segregating individuals by race did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment, so long as the facilities and services provided to each race were equal in nature. Origin. 1896. Separate but Equal Doctrine

  9. Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) | National Archives

    www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/plessy-v-ferguson

    In the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Tourgée argued that the law requiring “separate but equal accommodations” was unconstitutional. When Judge John H. Ferguson ruled against him, Plessy applied to the State Supreme Court for a writ of prohibition and certiorari.

  10. Separate but Equal - Separate Is Not Equal - National Museum of...

    www.americanhistory.si.edu/brown/history/1-segregated/separate-but-equal.html

    In the pivotal case of Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that racially separate facilities, if equal, did not violate the Constitution. Segregation, the Court said, was not discrimination. The members of the United States Supreme Court, 1896-97.

  11. On May 18, 1896, the U.S. Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson ruled that separate-but-equal facilities were constitutional. The Plessy v. Ferguson decision upheld the principle of racial segregation over the next half-century.