Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
All-purpose yards or all-purpose yardage is a gridiron football statistical measure. It is virtually the same as the statistic that some football leagues refer to as combined net yards . [ 1 ] In the game of football, progress is measured by advancing the football towards the opposing team's goal line .
Printable version; In other projects Wikidata item; ... out of 49 total. ... All-purpose yardage; C. Conversion (gridiron football) D. Dead zone (gridiron football)
4 - Don Sutherin (for Hamilton vs Edmonton, September 11, 1961) 4 - Art Johnson (for Toronto vs Montreal, October 7, 1961) 4 - Peter Ribbins (for Winnipeg vs BC, August 17, 1972) 4 - Al Brenner (for Hamilton vs Toronto, November 5, 1972) 4 - Chris Sigler (for Montreal vs Ottawa, June 27, 1986) 4 - Less Browne (for Hamilton vs Montreal, August ...
Scrimmage yards Special teams yards All-purpose yards 1954: 1360 Alex Webster: 805 Johnny Fedosoff: 1791 Ken Carpenter: 1955: 1525 Pat Abruzzi: 960 Don Pinhey: 1610 Pat Abruzzi 1956: 2039 Hal Patterson: 988 Don Pinhey 2858 Hal Patterson 1957: 1979 Johnny Bright: 1026 Harry Lunn: 2011 Johnny Bright 1958: 1987 Johnny Bright 1512 Mike Hagler: 2550 ...
That same year, the CFL also moved back its line of scrimmage for one-point converts to the 25-yard line (while moving the scrimmage line for a two-point convert ahead two yards to the 3-yard line), thus making the length for a one-point attempt the same in both the NFL and CFL (taking into account the NFL's goalposts on the end line, and the ...
Kick return yards and punt return yards result from voluntary change in possession and most of the others result from involuntary forms of change in possession known as turnovers. Often kick return and punt return statistics are aggregated. and sometimes they are added to yards from scrimmage to yield all-purpose yards. When kick return yards ...
Template talk: CFL receiving yardage leaders. Add languages. ... Print/export Download as PDF; Printable version ...
Mobile page views account for approximately 68% of all page views (90-day average as of September 2024). Briefly, these templates are not included in articles because 1) they are not well designed for mobile, and 2) they significantly increase page sizes—bad for mobile downloads—in a way that is not useful for the mobile use case.